From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9587C433E6 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 11:45:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isis.lip6.fr (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CE57207BB for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 11:45:23 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6CE57207BB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=inria.fr Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr Received: from systeme.lip6.fr (systeme.lip6.fr [132.227.104.7]) by isis.lip6.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07TBjBBW029598; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 13:45:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from systeme.lip6.fr (systeme.lip6.fr [127.0.0.1]) by systeme.lip6.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C7BC777D; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 13:45:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from isis.lip6.fr (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by systeme.lip6.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D75133F6C for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 13:45:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by isis.lip6.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 07TBj8YY019070 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 13:45:08 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,359,1592863200"; d="scan'208";a="465200867" Received: from abo-173-121-68.mrs.modulonet.fr (HELO hadrien) ([85.68.121.173]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Aug 2020 13:45:08 +0200 Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 13:45:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: jll@hadrien To: Markus Elfring In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <75644b75-443c-1da9-fd1b-35e2ce34cf47@web.de> <2a6a3871-610b-07ad-40d5-5530c18d3c21@web.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (DEB 394 2020-01-19) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8323329-1011286731-1598701508=:3629" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, Sender e-mail whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]); Sat, 29 Aug 2020 13:45:11 +0200 (CEST) X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]); Sat, 29 Aug 2020 13:45:08 +0200 (CEST) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 132.227.60.2 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 132.227.60.2 Cc: Kees Cook , Coccinelle , "Gustavo A. R. Silva" Subject: Re: [Cocci] Checking the application of a SmPL disjunction for a function call addition X-BeenThere: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr Errors-To: cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323329-1011286731-1598701508=:3629 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Sat, 29 Aug 2020, Markus Elfring wrote: > >> Will this information trigger further consequences for the clarification > >> of the topic “[RFC PATCH] coccinelle: api: add flex_array_size.cocci script”? > >> https://lore.kernel.org/cocci/20200828163134.496386-1-efremov@linux.com/ > >> https://systeme.lip6.fr/pipermail/cocci/2020-August/008169.html > > > > As far as I can see, in that semantic patch, array is always inherited > > from a previous rule. > > Does this technical detail change the handling of the discussed SmPL disjunction > in any ways? size is bound if and only if array is bound. All of the rules contain size in the removed (and thus matched) code, so a binding of array is always available. julia --8323329-1011286731-1598701508=:3629 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci --8323329-1011286731-1598701508=:3629--