public inbox for cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>, cocci@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [cocci] Searching for selected variable assignments (with SmPL)?
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2025 12:25:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ce7a7254-bbb3-4666-8a57-2e6cccaa51fc@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13ed7845-6fd9-4a8e-9670-3d2b7e7a0f4e@web.de>

> We might not be able to continue a search directly after a known source code position.
> But I assume that it would be possible to direct a search repetition to the place
> which was determined before (according to a semicolon for example).

The initially mentioned SmPL script pointed the implementation of the function “arm_dt_init_cpu_maps”
(besides others) for further development considerations.
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.17-rc4/source/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c#L59-L165

I tried also the following SmPL script variant out.


@find@
expression e;
position place;
type t;
t * pointer;
@@
 pointer = e(...);@place

@display@
position find.place;
statement s;
type find.t;
t * find.pointer;
@@
*;@place
 if (!pointer)
    s
 ... when != pointer


Unfortunately, it does not present the known implementation details.

Questionable test result:
Markus_Elfring@Sonne:…/Projekte/Linux/next-analyses> /usr/bin/spatch --no-loops …/Projekte/Coccinelle/janitor/show_unused_addresses_from_variable_assignments.cocci arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c
…
[no diff output]


I would appreciate corresponding software improvements.

Regards,
Markus

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-06 10:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-04 12:36 [cocci] Searching for missing cleanup function calls (with SmPL)? Markus Elfring
2025-09-04 12:43 ` Julia Lawall
2025-09-04 12:58   ` Markus Elfring
2025-09-12  9:29   ` Markus Elfring
2025-09-12 11:07     ` Julia Lawall
2025-09-12 12:30       ` Markus Elfring
2025-09-12 13:43     ` Markus Elfring
2025-09-12 15:43   ` Markus Elfring
2025-09-06  8:00 ` [cocci] Searching for selected variable assignments " Markus Elfring
2025-09-06  8:07   ` Julia Lawall
2025-09-06  8:10     ` Markus Elfring
2025-09-06  8:22       ` Julia Lawall
2025-09-06  9:11         ` Markus Elfring
2025-09-06  9:14           ` Julia Lawall
2025-09-06  9:28             ` Markus Elfring
2025-09-06 10:25               ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2025-09-06 11:12                 ` Julia Lawall
2025-09-06 12:07                   ` Markus Elfring
2025-09-06 12:13                     ` Julia Lawall
2025-09-06 12:30                       ` Markus Elfring
2025-09-06 12:36                         ` Julia Lawall
2025-09-06 12:47                           ` Markus Elfring
2025-09-06 12:51                             ` Julia Lawall
2025-09-06 13:20     ` Markus Elfring
2025-09-08  6:15       ` Markus Elfring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ce7a7254-bbb3-4666-8a57-2e6cccaa51fc@web.de \
    --to=markus.elfring@web.de \
    --cc=cocci@inria.fr \
    --cc=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox