From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Hansen Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Track in-kernel when we expect checkpoint/restart to work Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:36:43 -0700 Message-ID: <1223656603.11830.50.camel@nimitz> References: <20081009190405.13A253CB@kernel> <1223626834.8787.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> <48EF144D.1050906@fr.ibm.com> <20081010145934.GF11695@elte.hu> <48EF7211.2000303@cs.columbia.edu> <1223656489.10017.33.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1223656489.10017.33.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Greg Kurz Cc: arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org, containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Ingo Molnar , Daniel Lezcano List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 18:34 +0200, Greg Kurz wrote: > This flag is weak... testing it gives absolutly no hint whether the > checkpoint may succeed or not. As it is designed now, a user can only be > aware that checkpoint is *forever* denied. I agree that it's only useful > as a "flexible CR todo list". Cool, so everyone agrees the patch is useful! -- Dave