From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH] handle the multi-threaded init's exit() properly Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 00:32:28 -0700 Message-ID: <20070807003228.60d047b4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20070802212009.GA516@tv-sign.ru> <20070806131345.3322c99e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070806203326.GA188@tv-sign.ru> <20070806221824.22a78312.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070807063431.GB23036@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070807063431.GB23036@us.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: sukadev@us.ibm.com Cc: Oleg Nesterov , "Eric W. Biederman" , Roland McGrath , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.osdl.org, Pavel Emelyanov List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 6 Aug 2007 23:34:31 -0700 sukadev@us.ibm.com wrote: > | The downside of this approach is that > | handle-the-multi-threaded-inits-exit-properly.patch looks more 2.6.24-ready > | than all the container stuff (based just on overall impact and > | speculativeness) > > Well, if it will help, we can drop these two patches from -mm, take Oleg's > patch and I can then resend these along with other pid ns patches. > > pid-namespaces-define-and-use-task_active_pid_ns-wrapper.patch. > pid-namespaces-rename-child_reaper-function.patch I'm reasonably sure that what I ended up with is OK. I'll send those two out again for double-checking, please.