From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleg Nesterov Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Signal semantics for pid namespaces Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 15:48:03 +0400 Message-ID: <20070901114803.GA215@tv-sign.ru> References: <20070831203834.GC3268@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070831203834.GC3268-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: sukadev-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org Cc: Containers , Pavel Emelianov List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org On 08/31, sukadev-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org wrote: > > @@ -48,7 +49,7 @@ static int sig_init_ignore(struct task_s > if (likely(!is_container_init(tsk->group_leader))) > return 0; > > - if (!in_interrupt()) > + if (is_current_in_ancestor_pid_ns(tsk) && !in_interrupt()) > return 0; We should return 1 in that case, afaics the logic is wrongly reversed. Oleg.