From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: yamamoto-jCdQPDEk3idL9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org (YAMAMOTO Takashi) Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] memory controller statistics Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 07:55:28 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <20071008225528.7A0481BF486@siro.lan> References: <4708752B.9080107@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 07 Oct 2007 11:26:59 +0530" <4708752B.9080107-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: balbir-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org Cc: containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org, minoura-jCdQPDEk3idL9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org > Forgot to mention one other detail, could we track the statistics > in bytes? We track usage and limit in bytes currently. I am open > to opinions on this, but the last time we discussed numbers, > tracking bytes was the preferred approach. while /proc/vmstat and others uses number of pages? IMO, numbers of pages make more sense for this kind of statistics. however, if there's a consensus, i can follow. after all, it's merely a matter of taste. YAMAMOTO Takashi