From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: yamamoto-jCdQPDEk3idL9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org (YAMAMOTO Takashi)
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] memory controller background reclamation
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 08:45:23 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <20071022234523.5FBE71C1231@siro.lan>
References: <471CD987.5030800@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 22 Oct 2007 22:40:31 +0530"
	<471CD987.5030800-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers>,
	<mailto:containers-request-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/containers>
List-Post: <mailto:containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <mailto:containers-request-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers>,
	<mailto:containers-request-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
To: svaidy-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org
Cc: containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org, minoura-jCdQPDEk3idL9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org, balbir-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org
List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org

hi,

> Can we potentially avoid direct reclaim and sleep if the charge is exceeded
> and let the background reclaim do the job and wake us up?

yes, but i left it for now because direct reclaim has its own benefits.

YAMAMOTO Takashi