From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] [IPV6]: Event type in addrconf_ifdown is mis-used.
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 13:33:56 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20080403.133356.257567635.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <1206259996.7528.12.camel@iris.sw.ru>
	<20080323.031724.208377895.davem@davemloft.net>
	<1206282899.7528.18.camel@iris.sw.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1206282899.7528.18.camel@iris.sw.ru>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: den@openvz.org
Cc: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kaber@trash.net, containers@lists.osdl.org, dlezcano@fr.ibm.com, benjamin.thery@bull.net
List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org

From: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 17:34:59 +0300

> You are perfectly correct and the place in addrconf_cleanup is that
> place when we believe that we should destroy all the staff.
> 
> You see, it is pretty useless to call addrconf_ifdown(dev, 2) after
> addrconf_dev(dev, 0) for a loopback in the current code! No new cleanups
> will be performed for 2, pls check :)

I've rereviewed these three patches and I agree with your
assesment.

Therefore, I've applied these three patches to net-2.6 and
will push them out after some build validation.

Thanks!