From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] Clone PTS namespace Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:57:49 -0500 Message-ID: <20080423175749.GA17618@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> References: <20080408215333.GA8799@us.ibm.com> <47FC138B.4070408@zytor.com> <1207779313.16926.12.camel@x61.ebiederm.org> <20080410015955.GA18227@sergelap.austin.rr.com> <1207812980.7509.25.camel@x61.ebiederm.org> <20080422142539.GA12623@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> <20080423143610.GA13718@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080423143610.GA13718@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Serge E. Hallyn" Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , "H. Peter Anvin" , Containers , clg@fr.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Emelyanov List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Quoting Serge E. Hallyn (serue@us.ibm.com): > Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm@xmission.com): > > "Serge E. Hallyn" writes: > > >> > > >> I'm hoping to be able to get back at this in the week or so as things > > >> settle down from my move. My last patches should be in my proof of > > >> concept network namespace tree, if they don't show up elsewhere. > > > > > > Is that the tree I'd get from > > > > > > git-fetch > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/linux-2.6-netns.git > > > master:ebieder.master > > > > Yes. > > > > > ? So I'd add a user_ns to the struct sysfs_tag_info? > > > > > > If so I'll give it a whirl. > > > > Sounds good. My apologies I keep being almost on the verge > > of getting someplace. > > Ok I've got the sysfs relevant patches ported to 2.6.25, and am looking > at how to extend it to handle /sys/kernel/uids. You have tagging tied > intimately to struct class. So the question is should I generalize the > taggint to deal with kobjects instead, or create a struct class user > and make /sys/kernel/uids a symlink to /sys/class/user/uids? Heh, never mind, I was thinking class was a kobject class, not a device class :) So I'll just have to generalize tagging. thanks, -serge > Opinions? > > thanks, > -serge > > PS: If you want me to post the patchset before handling userns I can do > that, otherwise I was just going to wait until I'm done with userns.