From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Nadia.Derbey-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org
Cc: containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 6/6] IPC/sem: .write operation for /proc/<self>/semundo
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:09:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080625210937.GF16374@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080625135540.271934000-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
Quoting Nadia.Derbey-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org (Nadia.Derbey-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org):
> PATCH [06/06]
>
> This patch introduces the .write seq operation for /proc/pid/semundo.
>
> In order to simplify the locking strategy, the write operation is only allowed
> to 'current'.
There should also be a patch against Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
> Signed-off-by: Nadia Derbey <Nadia.Derbey-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
>
> ---
> fs/proc/base.c | 2
> ipc/sem.c | 250 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 250 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6.26-rc5-mm3/fs/proc/base.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.26-rc5-mm3.orig/fs/proc/base.c 2008-06-24 10:03:33.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.26-rc5-mm3/fs/proc/base.c 2008-06-24 13:21:44.000000000 +0200
> @@ -2526,7 +2526,7 @@ static const struct pid_entry tgid_base_
> INF("io", S_IRUGO, tgid_io_accounting),
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_SYSVIPC
> - REG("semundo", S_IRUGO, semundo),
> + REG("semundo", S_IWUSR|S_IRUGO, semundo),
> #endif
> };
>
> Index: linux-2.6.26-rc5-mm3/ipc/sem.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.26-rc5-mm3.orig/ipc/sem.c 2008-06-24 12:59:15.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.26-rc5-mm3/ipc/sem.c 2008-06-25 08:56:07.000000000 +0200
> @@ -1554,7 +1554,27 @@ static int semundo_open(struct inode *in
> goto out_err;
> }
>
> - ulp = get_proc_ulp(task);
> + if (file->f_flags & O_WRONLY || file->f_flags & O_RDWR) {
> + /*
> + * Writing is only allowed to current
> + */
> + if (task != current) {
> + put_task_struct(task);
> + ret = -EPERM;
> + goto out_err;
> + }
> + /*
> + * No need to increment the undo_list's refcnt: only current
> + * can be freeing it through exit, and we are current.
> + * Only signal through the ulp NULL pointer that it won't be
> + * necessary to decrement the refcnt during release.
> + * Actually, in this path the undo_list will be gotten during
> + * the write operation.
> + */
(I'll probably regret asking this when I turn out to be obviously wrong,
but:)
What if I'm opening the file O_RDWR and first read the file? You'll end
up showing no entries, right?
Which may be ok, so long as it's properly documented in proc.txt...
thanks,
-serge
> + ulp = NULL;
> + } else
> + ulp = get_proc_ulp(task);
> +
> ns = get_ipc_ns(task->nsproxy->ipc_ns);
> put_task_struct(task);
>
> @@ -1574,6 +1594,233 @@ out_err:
> return ret;
> }
>
> +/* Skip all spaces at the beginning of the buffer */
> +static inline int skip_space(const char __user **buf, size_t *len)
> +{
> + char c = 0;
> + while (*len) {
> + if (get_user(c, *buf))
> + return -EFAULT;
> + if (c != '\t' && c != ' ')
> + break;
> + --*len;
> + ++*buf;
> + }
> + return c;
> +}
> +
> +/* Retrieve the first numerical value contained in the string.
> + * Note: The value is supposed to be a 32-bit integer.
> + */
> +static inline int get_next_value(const char __user **buf, size_t *len, int *val)
> +{
> +#define BUFLEN 11
> + int err, neg = 0, left;
> + char s[BUFLEN], *p;
> +
> + err = skip_space(buf, len);
> + if (err < 0)
> + return err;
> + if (!*len)
> + return INT_MAX;
> + if (err == '\n') {
> + ++*buf;
> + --*len;
> + return INT_MAX;
> + }
> + if (err == '-') {
> + ++*buf;
> + --*len;
> + neg = 1;
> + }
> +
> + left = *len;
> + if (left > sizeof(s) - 1)
> + left = sizeof(s) - 1;
> + if (copy_from_user(s, *buf, left))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + s[left] = 0;
> + p = s;
> + if (*p < '0' || *p > '9')
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + *val = simple_strtoul(p, &p, 0);
> + if (neg)
> + *val = -(*val);
> +
> + left = p-s;
> + (*len) -= left;
> + (*buf) += left;
> +
> + return 0;
> +#undef BUFLEN
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Reads a line from /proc/self/semundo.
> + * Returns the number of undo values read (or errcode upon failure).
> + * @id: pointer to the semid (filled in with 1st field in the line)
> + * @array: semundo values (filled in iwth remaining fields in the line).
> + * @array_len: max # of expected semundo values
> + */
> +static inline int semundo_readline(const char __user **buf, size_t *left,
> + int *id, short *array, int array_len)
> +{
> + int i, val, err;
> +
> + /* Read semid */
> + err = get_next_value(buf, left, id);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + /* Read all (semundo-) values of a full line */
> + for (i = 0; ; i++) {
> + err = get_next_value(buf, left, &val);
> + if (err < 0)
> + return err;
> + /* reached end of line or end of buffer */
> + if (err == INT_MAX)
> + break;
> + /* Return an error if we get more values than expected */
> + if (i < array_len)
> + array[i] = val;
> + else
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + return i;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * sets or updates the undo values for the undo_list of a given semaphore id.
> + * This is exactly the same code sequence as sys_semtimedop if we have undos.
> + */
> +static inline int semundo_update(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int semid,
> + short *array, int size)
> +{
> + struct sem_undo *un;
> + struct sem_array *sma;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + un = find_alloc_undo(ns, semid);
> + if (IS_ERR(un)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(un);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + /* lookup the sem_array */
> + sma = sem_lock(ns, semid);
> + if (IS_ERR(sma)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(sma);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * find_alloc_undo opened an rcu read section to protect un.
> + * Releasing it here is safe:
> + * . sem_lock is held, so we are protected against IPC_RMID
> + * . the refcnt won't fall to 0 since exit_sem only operates on
> + * current and we are the current.
> + */
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> + /*
> + * semid identifiers are not unique - find_alloc_undo() may have
> + * allocated an undo structure, it was invalidated by an RMID and now
> + * a new array received the same id.
> + * Check and fail.
> + * This case can be detected checking un->semid. The existance of
> + * "un" itself is guaranteed by rcu.
> + */
> + if (un->semid == -1) {
> + ret = -EIDRM;
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * If the number of values given does not match the number of
> + * semaphores in the array, consider this as an error.
> + */
> + if (size != sma->sem_nsems) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
> +
> + /* update the undo values */
> + while (--size >= 0)
> + un->semadj[size] = array[size];
> +
> + /* maybe some queued-up processes were waiting for this */
> + update_queue(sma);
> +
> +out_unlock:
> + sem_unlock(sma);
> +out:
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * write operation for /proc/self/semundo file
> + *
> + * Only current is allowed to write to its semundo file.
> + *
> + * The expected string format is:
> + * "<semID> <val1> <val2> ... <valN>"
> + *
> + * It sets (or updates) the sem_undo list for 'current' and the target
> + * <semID>, to the given 'undo' values.
> + *
> + * <semID> must match an existing semaphore array.
> + * The number of values following <semID> must match the number of semaphores
> + * in the corresponding array.
> + *
> + * Multiple semID's can be passed simultaneously: newline ('\n') is considered
> + * as a separator in that case.
> + *
> + * Note: it is not allowed to set the sem_undo list for a given semID using
> + * mutliple write calls.
> + */
> +static ssize_t semundo_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
> + size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> +{
> + struct seq_file *m = file->private_data;
> + short *array;
> + int err, max_sem, semid = 0;
> + size_t left = count;
> + struct undo_list_data *data = m->private;
> + struct ipc_namespace *ns = data->ipc_ns;
> +
> + if (data->undo_list)
> + /* Should never happen */
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + max_sem = ns->sc_semmsl;
> +
> + array = kmalloc(sizeof(short)*max_sem, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (array == NULL)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + while (left) {
> + int nval;
> +
> + nval = semundo_readline(&buf, &left, &semid, array, max_sem);
> + if (nval < 0) {
> + err = nval;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + err = semundo_update(ns, semid, array, nval);
> + if (err)
> + goto out;
> + }
> + err = count - left;
> +
> +out:
> + kfree(array);
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> static int semundo_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> {
> struct seq_file *m = file->private_data;
> @@ -1590,6 +1837,7 @@ static int semundo_release(struct inode
> const struct file_operations proc_semundo_operations = {
> .open = semundo_open,
> .read = seq_read,
> + .write = semundo_write,
> .llseek = seq_lseek,
> .release = semundo_release,
> };
>
> --
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-25 21:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-25 13:49 [RFC PATCH 0/6] SYSVIPC/semaphores - allow saving/restoring a process' semundo_list Nadia.Derbey-6ktuUTfB/bM
2008-06-25 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] IPC/sem: RCU-protect the process semundo list Nadia.Derbey-6ktuUTfB/bM
[not found] ` <20080625135538.385496000-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
2008-06-25 20:33 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-06-25 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] IPC/sem: per <pid> semundo file in procfs Nadia.Derbey-6ktuUTfB/bM
[not found] ` <20080625135538.762662000-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
2008-06-25 20:33 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-06-26 5:08 ` Michael Kerrisk
[not found] ` <517f3f820806252208m1f5b91dfm38b8babff73adf72-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2008-06-26 6:07 ` Nadia Derbey
2008-06-25 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] IPC/sem: start/stop operations for /proc/pid/semundo Nadia.Derbey-6ktuUTfB/bM
[not found] ` <20080625135539.139605000-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
2008-06-25 20:39 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-06-25 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] IPC/sem: next " Nadia.Derbey-6ktuUTfB/bM
[not found] ` <20080625135539.519489000-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
2008-06-25 20:57 ` Serge E. Hallyn
[not found] ` <20080625205719.GD16374-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-06-26 5:35 ` Nadia Derbey
2008-06-25 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] IPC/sem: .show operation " Nadia.Derbey-6ktuUTfB/bM
[not found] ` <20080625135539.893049000-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
2008-06-25 20:58 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-06-25 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] IPC/sem: .write operation for /proc/<self>/semundo Nadia.Derbey-6ktuUTfB/bM
[not found] ` <20080625135540.271934000-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
2008-06-25 21:09 ` Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
[not found] ` <20080625210937.GF16374-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-06-26 5:44 ` Nadia Derbey
2008-06-27 14:06 ` Serge E. Hallyn
[not found] ` <20080627140607.GA20581-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-06-27 14:12 ` Nadia Derbey
2008-06-30 8:37 ` Nadia Derbey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080625210937.GF16374@us.ibm.com \
--to=serue-r/jw6+rmf7hqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=Nadia.Derbey-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org \
--cc=containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox