From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ftrace: add cpu annotation for function graph tracer Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 21:55:28 -0800 Message-ID: <20081125215528.eff18969.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20081126051622.134970943@goodmis.org> <20081126051710.339437727@goodmis.org> <20081125213909.d4eb3f09.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20081126054728.GD9732@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20081126054728.GD9732@elte.hu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Frederic Weisbecker , containers@lists.osdl.org, Sukadev Bhattiprolu , "Serge E. Hallyn" , "Eric W. Biederman" , Steven Rostedt List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 06:47:28 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:16:27 -0500 Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > > This patch adds the annotation of 'CPU[###]' where ### is a three > > > digit number > > > > Is this a plot to get yourself sent a 1024-way test box? > > So you are suggesting to change it to 4 digit printout? Not really. I somehow doubt that it's economic to do your software tuning on the 1024-way ;) > (Is this a plot to get yourself snt a 16384-way test box? ;-) I'd settle for 1.6384 testers.