From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: oleg@redhat.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, roland@redhat.com,
bastian@waldi.eu.org
Cc: daniel@hozac.com, xemul@openvz.org, containers@lists.osdl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sukadev@us.ibm.com
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 2/6][v3] Protect init from unwanted signals more
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 16:53:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081221005319.GB5025@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081221005106.GA4912@us.ibm.com>
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:12:45 -0800
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 2/6][v3] Protect init from unwanted signals more
(This is a modified version of the patch submitted by Oleg Nesterov
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/11/18/249 and tries to address comments
that came up in that discussion)
init ignores the SIG_DFL signals but we queue them anyway, including
SIGKILL. This is mostly OK, the signal will be dropped silently when
dequeued, but the pending SIGKILL has 2 bad implications:
- it implies fatal_signal_pending(), so we confuse things
like wait_for_completion_killable/lock_page_killable.
- for the sub-namespace inits, the pending SIGKILL can
mask (legacy_queue) the subsequent SIGKILL from the
parent namespace which must kill cinit reliably.
(preparation, cinits don't have SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE yet)
The patch can't help when init is ptraced, but ptracing of init is
not "safe" anyway.
Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/signal.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index 7945e71..55f41b6 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -53,10 +53,21 @@ static int sig_handler_ignored(void __user *handler, int sig)
(handler == SIG_DFL && sig_kernel_ignore(sig));
}
-static int sig_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig)
+static int sig_task_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig)
{
void __user *handler;
+ handler = sig_handler(t, sig);
+
+ if (unlikely(t->signal->flags & SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE) &&
+ (handler == SIG_IGN || handler == SIG_DFL))
+ return 1;
+
+ return sig_handler_ignored(handler, sig);
+}
+
+static int sig_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig)
+{
/*
* Blocked signals are never ignored, since the
* signal handler may change by the time it is
@@ -65,8 +76,7 @@ static int sig_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig)
if (sigismember(&t->blocked, sig) || sigismember(&t->real_blocked, sig))
return 0;
- handler = sig_handler(t, sig);
- if (!sig_handler_ignored(handler, sig))
+ if (!sig_task_ignored(t, sig))
return 0;
/*
--
1.5.2.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-21 0:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-21 0:51 [RFC][PATCH 0/6][v3] Container-init signal semantics Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-21 0:52 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/6][v3] Remove 'handler' parameter to tracehook functions Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-23 19:30 ` Roland McGrath
2008-12-21 0:53 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu [this message]
[not found] ` <20081221005319.GB5025-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-23 19:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/6][v3] Protect init from unwanted signals more Roland McGrath
[not found] ` <20081221005106.GA4912-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-21 0:53 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/6][v3] Define/set SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE_FROM_NS Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-21 0:54 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/6][v3] Define siginfo_from_ancestor_ns() Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-22 22:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
[not found] ` <20081222222604.GA1536-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-22 23:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-12-22 23:58 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-23 0:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
[not found] ` <20081223002215.GA7984-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-23 0:32 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-12-23 4:47 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-22 23:45 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-22 23:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-12-21 0:54 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/6][v3] Protect cinit from unblocked SIG_DFL signals Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-22 22:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-12-21 0:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/6][v3] Protect cinit from blocked fatal signals Sukadev Bhattiprolu
[not found] ` <20081221005529.GF5025-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-22 22:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-12-22 23:38 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
[not found] ` <20081222233855.GA13079-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-23 0:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-12-22 10:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/6][v3] Container-init signal semantics Eric W. Biederman
2008-12-22 19:47 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
[not found] ` <20081222194737.GC9085-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-23 0:27 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-12-23 2:12 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-23 16:51 ` Serge E. Hallyn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081221005319.GB5025@us.ibm.com \
--to=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bastian@waldi.eu.org \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=daniel@hozac.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=sukadev@us.ibm.com \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox