From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Nathan Lynch <ntl-e+AXbWqSrlAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org,
Dan Smith <danms-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] c/r: define s390-specific checkpoint-restart code (v6)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:34:54 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090225233454.GA29972@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090225162817.2003383c-4v5LP+xe+1byhTdZtsIeww@public.gmane.org>
Quoting Nathan Lynch (ntl-e+AXbWqSrlAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org):
> > +#if 0
> > + /* Oren's v13 is on an older kernel which has no vdso_base
> > + * on newer kernel, we'll have to enable this
> > + */
> > + CR_COPY(op, hh->vdso_base, mm->context.vdso_base);
> > +#endif
>
> During restart, does this replace the current task's VDSO contents, and
> if so, is that wise? VDSO areas contain things like timestamps for
> gettimeofday()...
(I've gone back and forth on this, and the following answer differs
from any interpretation i've had before :)
Well, arch_setup_additional_pages() uses get_unmapped_area() to get
a user mapping for the vdso pages. So i would expect that in fact
the arch-independent code would set up a new vdso mapping at the
checkpointed location, and so mm->context.vdso_base does in fact
need to be changed.
But it's something to verify when we port the code to a newer
kernel.
-serge
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-25 23:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-25 18:12 [PATCH 0/3] c/r: Add s390 support Dan Smith
[not found] ` <1235585529-806-1-git-send-email-danms-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-25 18:12 ` [PATCH 1/3] s390: Expose a constant for the number of words representing the CRs Dan Smith
2009-02-25 18:12 ` [PATCH 2/3] c/r: Add CR_COPY() macro (v2) Dan Smith
[not found] ` <1235585529-806-3-git-send-email-danms-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-25 22:08 ` Nathan Lynch
[not found] ` <20090225160841.4d727144-4v5LP+xe+1byhTdZtsIeww@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-25 22:21 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-02-25 22:23 ` Dan Smith
2009-02-25 18:12 ` [PATCH 3/3] c/r: define s390-specific checkpoint-restart code (v6) Dan Smith
[not found] ` <1235585529-806-4-git-send-email-danms-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-25 22:28 ` Nathan Lynch
[not found] ` <20090225162817.2003383c-4v5LP+xe+1byhTdZtsIeww@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-25 22:37 ` Dan Smith
2009-02-25 23:34 ` Nathan Lynch
2009-02-25 23:34 ` Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090225233454.GA29972@us.ibm.com \
--to=serue-r/jw6+rmf7hqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=danms-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ntl-e+AXbWqSrlAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox