From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Track in-kernel when we expect checkpoint/restart to work Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:57:48 -0500 Message-ID: <20090312165748.GA17253@us.ibm.com> References: <20090312042416.GC7733@us.ibm.com> <20090312042503.GA8703@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090312042503.GA8703-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu Cc: Containers , "David C. Hansen" List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Quoting Sukadev Bhattiprolu (sukadev-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org): Hi Suka, the reason this patch was dropped is that we've moved from task to slightly more per-resource checkpointability tracking. So right now there is no t->may_checkpoint, but there is t->files->may_checkpoint and t->mm->may_checkpoint. -serge