Linux Container Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu
	<sukadev-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Containers <containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org>,
	"David C. Hansen"
	<haveblue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] Check 'may_checkpoint()' early
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:33:14 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090312173314.GB17253@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090312042559.GD8703-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

Quoting Sukadev Bhattiprolu (sukadev-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org):
> 
> From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
> Subject: [PATCH 4/5] Check 'may_checkpoint()' early
> 
> We currently check if a task is checkpointable when writing the task
> information to checkpoint file. The small downside of doing this check
> late is that we may have processed several processes in the tree before
> hitting one that cannot be checkpointed.
> 
> We anyway walk the process tree we are checkpointing earlier, while
> counting the tasks. We could check if all processes in the tree are
> checkpointable at that time and fail early if any of them are not.
> Since the process tree should be frozen, checking earlier should not
> matter ?
> 
> For now, the patch leaves the existing check in cr_write_pids(). We
> can remove that later.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>

Yes this seems like a good idea to me.

Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

> ---
>  checkpoint/checkpoint.c |    9 +++++++++
>  1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/checkpoint/checkpoint.c b/checkpoint/checkpoint.c
> index fbcd9eb..9189abb 100644
> --- a/checkpoint/checkpoint.c
> +++ b/checkpoint/checkpoint.c
> @@ -346,11 +346,18 @@ static int cr_tree_count_tasks(struct cr_ctx *ctx)
>  	struct task_struct **tasks_arr = ctx->tasks_arr;
>  	int tasks_nr = ctx->tasks_nr;
>  	int nr = 0;
> +	int ret;
> 
>  	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> 
>  	/* count tasks via DFS scan of the tree */
>  	while (1) {
> +		ret = cr_may_checkpoint_task(task, ctx);
> +		if (ret < 0) {
> +			nr = ret;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
>  		if (tasks_arr) {
>  			/* unlikely, but ... */
>  			if (nr == tasks_nr)
> @@ -406,6 +413,8 @@ static int cr_build_tree(struct cr_ctx *ctx)
> 
>  	/* count tasks (no side effects) */
>  	n = cr_tree_count_tasks(ctx);
> +	if (n < 0)
> +		return n;
> 
>  	ctx->tasks_nr = n;
>  	ctx->tasks_arr = kzalloc(n * sizeof(*ctx->tasks_arr), GFP_KERNEL);
> -- 
> 1.5.2.5
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Containers mailing list
> Containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-03-12 17:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-12  4:24 [PATCH 0/5] Missing patches in Dave Hansen's tree Sukadev Bhattiprolu
     [not found] ` <20090312042416.GC7733-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-03-12  4:25   ` [PATCH 1/5] Track in-kernel when we expect checkpoint/restart to work Sukadev Bhattiprolu
     [not found]     ` <20090312042503.GA8703-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-03-12 16:57       ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-12  4:25   ` [PATCH 2/5] Checkpoint multiple processes Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-03-12  4:25   ` [PATCH 3/5] Restart " Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-03-12  4:25   ` [PATCH 4/5] Check 'may_checkpoint()' early Sukadev Bhattiprolu
     [not found]     ` <20090312042559.GD8703-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-03-12 17:33       ` Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
2009-03-12  4:26   ` [PATCH 5/5] Deny external checkpoint unless task is frozen Sukadev Bhattiprolu
     [not found]     ` <20090312042614.GE8703-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-03-12 17:37       ` Serge E. Hallyn
     [not found]         ` <20090312173707.GC17253-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-03-13  3:19           ` Oren Laadan
     [not found]             ` <49B9D0BD.40701-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
2009-03-13 13:54               ` Serge E. Hallyn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090312173314.GB17253@us.ibm.com \
    --to=serue-r/jw6+rmf7hqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=haveblue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=sukadev-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox