From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: IO scheduler based IO Controller V2 Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 13:24:41 -0700 Message-ID: <20090505132441.1705bfad.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <1241553525-28095-1-git-send-email-vgoyal@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1241553525-28095-1-git-send-email-vgoyal-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Vivek Goyal Cc: dhaval-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org, snitzer-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, dm-devel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, agk-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, balbir-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org, paolo.valente-rcYM44yAMweonA0d6jMUrA@public.gmane.org, fernando-gVGce1chcLdL9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org, jmoyer-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, fchecconi-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, righi.andrea-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 5 May 2009 15:58:27 -0400 Vivek Goyal wrote: > > Hi All, > > Here is the V2 of the IO controller patches generated on top of 2.6.30-rc4. > ... > Currently primarily two other IO controller proposals are out there. > > dm-ioband > --------- > This patch set is from Ryo Tsuruta from valinux. > ... > IO-throttling > ------------- > This patch set is from Andrea Righi provides max bandwidth controller. I'm thinking we need to lock you guys in a room and come back in 15 minutes. Seriously, how are we to resolve this? We could lock me in a room and cmoe back in 15 days, but there's no reason to believe that I'd emerge with the best answer. I tend to think that a cgroup-based controller is the way to go. Anything else will need to be wired up to cgroups _anyway_, and that might end up messy.