From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleg Nesterov Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] Prevent container-inits from using CLONE_PARENT Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:42:16 +0200 Message-ID: <20090618154216.GB6404@redhat.com> References: <20090618024743.GA31515@us.ibm.com> <20090618025103.GB31672@us.ibm.com> <20090618153501.GA6404@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090618153501.GA6404-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu Cc: Containers , "David C. Hansen" , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, "Eric W. Biederman" , Alexey Dobriyan , roland-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, Pavel Emelyanov List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org On 06/18, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > On 06/17, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: > > > > @@ -974,6 +974,14 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process( > > if ((clone_flags & CLONE_SIGHAND) && !(clone_flags & CLONE_VM)) > > return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > > > > + /* > > + * To keep pid namespace semantics simple, prevent container-inits > > + * from creating siblings. > > + */ > > + if ((clone_flags & CLONE_PARENT) && > > + is_container_init(current) && !is_global_init(current)) > > Both is_ checks are not right afaics. There are per-thread. This means > that container-init can do clone(CLONE_THREAD), and then this thread > does CLONE_PARENT and fools copy_process(). > > As for !is_global_init(). I never understood what should we do if the > global init does CLONE_PARENT, this attaches another process to swapper, > not good. Hmm. And idle threads run with ->action[SIGHLD] == SIG_DFL, so this is really wrong. Fortunately, we can trust the global init. Oleg.