From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
To: Oren Laadan <orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Containers
<containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: restart (mktree) program usage
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 22:56:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090909055636.GA27622@us.ibm.com> (raw)
I have a usage question on the 'restart' (formerly mktree) program.
In the following container c/r case:
- create a container
- log in to the container,
- restore filesystem(s) from snapshot
- restart application from checkpoint
On restart, suppose the user wants to restore the original pids.
But he does not want to create a new pid-ns, (since he just created
the container, and is sure the original pids are available).
To accomplish this the user has to specify the arguments in the following
order right (since -pids implies --pidns).
restart --pids --no-pidns
IOW, the order of the arguments matters.
Would it be easier to understand if --pids did not imply --pidns ?
(Or in fact the reverse seems to make more sense -i.e --pidns implies
--pids, with a new option, --no-pids if user absolutely hates the pids
he was dealt before checkpoint :-)
$ restart
don't create pid ns, don't try to restore pids
$ restart --pids
try to restore original pids, don't create pid-ns
$ restart --pidns
create new pid-namespace and restore original pids
$ restart --pidns --no-pids
$ restart --no-pids --pidns
create new pid-namespace, DO NOT restore pids
Or maybe drop implying and let user explicitly specify one, none or
both of --pids, --pidns ?
Sukadev
next reply other threads:[~2009-09-09 5:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-09 5:56 Sukadev Bhattiprolu [this message]
[not found] ` <20090909055636.GA27622-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-09 22:26 ` restart (mktree) program usage Oren Laadan
[not found] ` <4AA82B7C.8080107-RdfvBDnrOixBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-17 1:35 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
[not found] ` <20090917013546.GA30161-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-17 3:14 ` Oren Laadan
[not found] ` <4AB1A99D.3020307-RdfvBDnrOixBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-17 13:18 ` Serge E. Hallyn
[not found] ` <20090917131843.GA29297-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-17 16:53 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
[not found] ` <20090917165311.GB13855-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-17 17:13 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-09-17 17:58 ` Oren Laadan
[not found] ` <4AB278D0.50604-RdfvBDnrOixBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-17 18:20 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-09-18 6:58 ` Cedric Le Goater
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090909055636.GA27622@us.ibm.com \
--to=sukadev-23vcf4htsmix0ybbhkvfkdbpr1lh4cv8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox