Re: [patch 1/1] remove EXPERIMENTAL on PID namespace

["Serge E. Hallyn" <serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]

Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezcano-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org):
> The pid namespace is enabled by default in different distros
> and the different bugs were fixed when they were reported.
> No new bug is reported since some time now, so I guess it's safe to
> remove the experimental condition on this subsystem.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>

I'd say so.

Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

> ---
>  init/Kconfig |    7 ++-----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/init/Kconfig
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/init/Kconfig
> +++ linux-2.6/init/Kconfig
> @@ -690,17 +690,14 @@ config USER_NS
>  	  If unsure, say N.
> 
>  config PID_NS
> -	bool "PID Namespaces (EXPERIMENTAL)"
> +	bool "PID Namespaces"
>  	default n
> -	depends on NAMESPACES && EXPERIMENTAL
> +	depends on NAMESPACES
>  	help
>  	  Support process id namespaces.  This allows having multiple
>  	  processes with the same pid as long as they are in different
>  	  pid namespaces.  This is a building block of containers.
> 
> -	  Unless you want to work with an experimental feature
> -	  say N here.
> -
>  config NET_NS
>  	bool "Network namespace"
>  	default n
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Containers mailing list
> Containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers