From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.33-rc4 i686 clone function looping (seems real!)
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:20:02 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100121202002.GA4725@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1264095325.4283.1198.camel@laptop>
Quoting Peter Zijlstra (peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org):
> On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 11:13 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > The culprit is e2912009fb7b715728311b0d8fe327a1432b3f79
> > sched: Ensure set_task_cpu() is never called on blocked tasks
> >
> > If you mount both the ns and cpuset cgroups with this patch applied,
> > then doing clone with CLONE_NEWPID, CLONE_NEWNET, etc, you get the
> > hang. The hang is actually hard enough that alt-sysrq isn't helpful :)
> > Still trying to figure out what is going on - Peter, any ideas offhand?
>
>
> Does it replicate on x86_64 ?
Hmm, doesn't seem to, no.
> /me looks at the NEWPID and NEWNET code
>
>
> Hmm, I have an idea.. does it really need the ns cgroup stuff?
To reproduce it? Well, there might be some other way to
trigger it, but mounting just cpusets and moving a task into
a different cpuset doesn't trigger it... So really it must
be something to do with kernel/cgroup.c:cgroup_clone()
> Let me try and come up with a debug patch...
thanks,
-serge
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-21 20:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-18 22:04 2.6.33-rc4 i686 clone function looping (?) Jean-Marc Pigeon
[not found] ` <1263852243.4745.363.camel-4BUXZ/Ty1v7iqR6jatDSCA@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-19 15:09 ` Serge E. Hallyn
[not found] ` <20100119150931.GA7708-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-19 16:00 ` 2.6.33-rc4 i686 clone function looping (seems real!) Jean-Marc Pigeon
[not found] ` <1263916851.4745.386.camel-4BUXZ/Ty1v7iqR6jatDSCA@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-19 22:10 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-01-19 22:15 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-01-21 17:13 ` Serge E. Hallyn
[not found] ` <20100121171338.GA16904-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-21 17:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-21 20:20 ` Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
2010-01-21 20:36 ` [RFC][PATCH] sched: Fix fork vs hotplug vs cpuset namespaces Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100121202002.GA4725@us.ibm.com \
--to=serue-r/jw6+rmf7hqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox