From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Jean-Marc Pigeon <jmp-4qkeo2rQ0gg@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Linux Containers <containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: iptables in container, wrong log destination, need pointer
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:51:10 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100211175110.GG6884@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1265898746.19130.119.camel-4BUXZ/Ty1v7iqR6jatDSCA@public.gmane.org>
Quoting Jean-Marc Pigeon (jmp-4qkeo2rQ0gg@public.gmane.org):
> Hello,
>
>
> I have containerized syslog, such each container has its
> own syslog.
>
> Container can have their own set of iptables rules.
>
> I was expecting CONT: iptables log report to be
> send to the CONT: syslog, which is not the case,
> they are rather sent to HOST: syslog.
>
> This means to me, iptables rules are containerized,
> but the execution is NOT (CONT: rules are checked
> within the HOST: context, not the CONT: context).
>
> Could somebody give me hint where I should look
> in the code, to have a better understanding about
> what is happening?
Again, printk can be called from any context, so you can't
rely on 'current'. But you are relying on current in
emit_log_char() to get the syslog_ns. That is why you're
getting that.
You're going to have to keep a separate container_printk
(nsprintk) which is called with a syslog_ns. Then in
functions where you know you can determine the syslog_ns,
you can call that fn instead of printk and pass the ns.
Note that since iptables printks are happening out of
context, this means yet another problem: you'll need to
have a way to get the syslog_ns from the netns, which
I suspect is the only thing can track at that point.
-serge
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-11 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-11 14:32 iptables in container, wrong log destination, need pointer Jean-Marc Pigeon
[not found] ` <1265898746.19130.119.camel-4BUXZ/Ty1v7iqR6jatDSCA@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-11 17:51 ` Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100211175110.GG6884@us.ibm.com \
--to=serue-r/jw6+rmf7hqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jmp-4qkeo2rQ0gg@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox