From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
To: Oren Laadan <orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>,
serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
Cc: Containers
<containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Prefix / Naming USERCR API
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:02:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100406020221.GA647@us.ibm.com> (raw)
Prefix / Function names for USERCR API
I guess the long term plan is to export the USERCR funtionality to management
or other applications as a library. We are trying to choose a good prefix for
the USERCR API.
The current prefix for the API is, which was cooked up on the fly, is
"app_". This prefix is currently used in structures/functions like:
struct app_checkpoint_args *
struct app_restart_args *
app_checkpoint()
app_restart()
In the future we may have additional apis like:
xxx_freeze()
xxx_migrate()
xxx_cr_advise() ?
Kernel api already uses some prefixes like (checkpoint, ckpt_ etc:
<linux/checkpoint.h>
<linux/checkpoint_hdr.h>
struct ckpt_hdr_header
struct ckpt_hdr
checkpoint(2)
restart(2)
#define RESTART_TASKSELF 0x1
#define CHECKPOINT_SUBTREE 0x1
Having a prefix would make it easy to identify the API and avoid collision
with other libraries that the application might link against. Eg: the
"pam_" prefixes PAM api.
Having a prefix like "cr_" or "acr_" could cause some redundancy in some
names, like cr_checkpoint(), but is probably ok, like pam_authenticate() ?
So, what would be a good prefix ?
cr_
cr_checkpoint.h, libcr.a
cr_checkpoint() cr_restart() cr_freeze() cr_migrate()
struct cr_checkpoint_args, struct cr_restart_args
acr_
Only advantage over 'cr_' is lesser likelihood of collision
acr_checkpoint.h, libacr.a
acr_checkpoint() acr_restart() acr_freeze() acr_migrate()
struct acr_checkpoint_args, struct acr_restart_args
lxcr_
lxcr_checkpoint.h, liblxcr.a
lxcr_checkpoint() lxcr_restart() lxcr_freeze() lxcr_migrate()
struct lxcr_checkpoint_args, struct lxcr_restart_args
Other prefixes or naming suggestions ?
Thanks,
Sukadev
next reply other threads:[~2010-04-06 2:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-06 2:02 Sukadev Bhattiprolu [this message]
[not found] ` <20100406020221.GA647-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-08 6:49 ` Prefix / Naming USERCR API Michel Normand
2010-04-10 3:48 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
[not found] ` <20100410034840.GA11028-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-10 13:06 ` Oren Laadan
[not found] ` <4BC077B8.6060305-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-11 17:02 ` Serge E. Hallyn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100406020221.GA647@us.ibm.com \
--to=sukadev-23vcf4htsmix0ybbhkvfkdbpr1lh4cv8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox