From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" Subject: Re: device(s) namespace Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 07:35:27 -0600 Message-ID: <20110127133527.GA2935@localhost> References: <4D404C0E.6040603@cs.columbia.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D404C0E.6040603-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Oren Laadan Cc: Linux Containers List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Quoting Oren Laadan (orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org): > Hi, > > I vaguely recall some discussions/ideas about the possibility > of a devices namespace, its pros and cons, and alternative. > Related to that is also device viruatlization, and isolation > of devices in containers. > > Any thoughts and or pointers to past/current discussions are > welcome :) I'm hoping to get my archive disk out this weekend or monday and search for these, if noone else finds them before that. -serge