From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Max Kellermann Subject: Re: [PATCH] new cgroup controller "fork" Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 18:48:09 +0100 Message-ID: <20111103174809.GA28108@rabbit.intern.cm-ag> References: <20111103162238.27609.11515.stgit@rabbit.intern.cm-ag> <20111103164302.GE8198@somewhere.redhat.com> <20111103171645.GA27887@rabbit.intern.cm-ag> <4EB2CEB2.7050800@parallels.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EB2CEB2.7050800-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Glauber Costa Cc: Tim Hockin , Frederic Weisbecker , containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Johannes Weiner , Andrew Morton List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org On 2011/11/03 18:26, Glauber Costa wrote: > On 11/03/2011 03:16 PM, Max Kellermann wrote: > >but is different from my controller. > > > How so? Once the "remaining" counter has reached zero, no further forks are possible, no matter how many processes are left. It is a fork counter, not a process counter. Let's say: Frederic's controller counts "things" that exists (processes), and my controller counts "verbs" or "ations" (fork()). Max