From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] cgroups: Task counter subsystem v6 Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 07:58:48 -0800 Message-ID: <20111213155848.GI25802@google.com> References: <1317668832-10784-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1317668832-10784-1-git-send-email-fweisbec-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Aditya Kali , Tim Hockin , Paul Menage , Kay Sievers , LKML , Oleg Nesterov , Johannes Weiner , Andrew Morton , Containers List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Hello, Frederic. Can you please rebase the patchset on top of cgroup/for-3.3? I primarily like the idea of being able to track process usage w/ cgroup and enforce limits on it but hope that it could somehow integrate w/ cgroup freezer. ie. trigger freezer if it goes over limit and let the userland tool / administrator deal with the frozen cgroup. I'm planning on extending cgroup freezer such that it supports recursive freezing and killing of frozen tasks. If we can fit task counters into that, we'll have general method of handling problematic cgroups - freeze, notify userland and let it deal with it. Thank you. -- tejun