From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xattr: Enable security.capability in user namespaces Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 20:01:38 -0500 Message-ID: <20170713010137.GA23575@mail.hallyn.com> References: <1499785511-17192-1-git-send-email-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1499785511-17192-2-git-send-email-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <87mv89iy7q.fsf@xmission.com> <20170712170346.GA17974@mail.hallyn.com> <87o9spfa5v.fsf@xmission.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87o9spfa5v.fsf-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: zohar-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org, containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, James.Bottomley-d9PhHud1JfjCXq6kfMZ53/egYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org, linux-security-module-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, casey-iSGtlc1asvQWG2LlvL+J4A@public.gmane.org, lkp-JC7UmRfGjtg@public.gmane.org List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org): > James Morris writes: > > > On Wed, 12 Jul 2017, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > > >> Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org): > >> > Stefan Berger <"Stefan Bergerstefanb"@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: > >> > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger > >> > > Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn > >> > > Reviewed-by: Serge Hallyn > >> > > >> > It doesn't look like this is coming through Serge so I don't see how > >> > the Signed-off-by tag is legtimate. > >> > >> This is mostly explained by the fact that there have been a *lot* of > >> changes, many of them discussed in private emails. I wasn't clear here. There were a lot of changes between the first mention of the approach and the posting of v1. My point was that I did in fact agree to Reviewed-by, and the fact that I've found a few more things to point out only reflects my missing them before. I don't think my name is being mis-used. > > Please try and keep technical discussions public or at least document them > > when reposting the patches. > > Yes please. > > A public discussion helps to understand what the challenges are. Yes, all discussion (that I can find in my mbox) since v1 has been public. -serge