From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Balbir Singh Subject: Re: [PATCH][for -mm] Fix and Enhancements for memory cgroup [0/6] intro Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 16:00:55 +0530 Message-ID: <470B585F.9040207@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20071009184620.8b14cbc6.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Reply-To: balbir-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20071009184620.8b14cbc6.kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: "containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org" , "linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org" , Andrew Morton List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > Hi, Balbir-san > This is a patch set against memory cgroup I have now. > Reflected comments I got. > > = > [1] charge refcnt fix patch - avoid charging against a page which is being > uncharged. > [2] fix-err-handling patch - remove unnecesary unlock_page_cgroup() > [3] lock and page->cgroup patch - add helper function for charge/uncharge > [4] avoid handling no LRU patch - makes mem_cgroup_isolate_pages() avoid > handling !Page_LRU pages. > [5] migration fix patch - a fix for page migration. > [6] force reclaim patch - add an interface for uncharging all pages in > empty cgroup. > = > Thank you very much for working on this. > BTW, which way would you like to go ? > > 1. You'll merge this set (and my future patch) to your set as > Memory Cgroup Maintainer and pass to Andrew Morton, later. > And we'll work against your tree. > 2. I post this set to the (next) -mm. And we'll work agaisnt -mm. > I think (2) is better. I don't maintain my own tree, so lets get all the fixes and enhancements into -mm > not as my usual patch, tested on x86-64 fake-NUMA. > I'll also test these patches. > Thanks, > -Kame > -- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL