Re: namespaces compatibility list

[Cedric Le Goater <clg-NmTC/0ZBporQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]

Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Pavel Emelyanov <xemul-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> writes:
> 
>> +2. Intentionnaly, two equal user ids in different user namespaces
>> +   should not be equal from the VFS point of view. In other
>> +   words, user 10 in one user namespace shouldn't have the same
>> +   access permissions to files, beloging to user 10 in another
>> +   namespace. But currently this is not so.
> 
> I don't know where this is going to land for a final call.
> But if the pid namespace has a chance of landing under CONFIG_BROKEN
> for the final stable release.

I prefered immature but he, any config name would do, just to make sure it
doesn't get shipped by default in distros

> We seriously want to consider the user namespace for the same treatment.
> We all seem to agree that it is incomplete.

yes.

C.