From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Lezcano Subject: Re: net-2.6.25-netns branch on git.openvz.org Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:00:49 +0100 Message-ID: <473C4301.6060507@fr.ibm.com> References: <473C35F1.9030901@sw.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <473C35F1.9030901-3ImXcnM4P+0@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: "Denis V. Lunev" Cc: Linux Containers , "Eric W. Biederman" , Pavel Emelianov List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Denis V. Lunev wrote: > Hi, All! > > I have ported what is ready to send to netdev to 2.6.25 and created > appropriate branches on git.openvz.org, namely > - net-2.6.25 aka Miller's 2.6.25 tree > - net-2.6.25-netns with ready patches resyncing ... thanks :) I will send in a few moments a first round for ipv6 taking into account ip6_fib. There some other pending patches I will send, I hope before the end of the week. I am a little lost with what we want to send for net-2.6.25. I mean we planned to send af_unix, af_packet, af_netlink, af_inet and af_inet6. What is the level of functionnality we want to provide with ipv4 and ipv6. For example we have addresss autoconfiguration for ipv6, shall we send it ? What about the todo list Pavel planned to do ?