From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Xpl++ <xpl-d4um4pvOpxY@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Prefixing cgroup generic control filenames with "cgroup."
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:38:20 +0200
Message-ID: <47C7EEAC.7010907@amln.net>
References: <6599ad830802281314s25c033d6tc021725ae28aef8d@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <6599ad830802281314s25c033d6tc021725ae28aef8d-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers>,
	<mailto:containers-request-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/containers>
List-Post: <mailto:containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <mailto:containers-request-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers>,
	<mailto:containers-request-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
To: Paul Menage <menage-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>, LKML <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>, Linux Containers <containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>, Balbir Singh <balbir-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>, Pavel Emelianov <xemul-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org

Paul Menage ??????:
> ...
>
> A compromise might be to keep "tasks" unprefixed, and say that future
> names get the "cgroup." prefix; in this case I'd be inclined to add
> the prefix to notify_on_release and release_agent on the grounds that
> there's much less chance of breaking anyone with those files since (I
> suspect) they're much less used.
>   
This makes most sense to me. It won't break any existing software (most 
likely) while it seems reasonable to leave 'tasks' unprefixed as this is 
something that any software using any subsystem of cgroup would be using 
anyway and it is not that much associated with a particulat subsystem.

Regards,
Peter Litov.