From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nadia Derbey Subject: Re: [Devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:38:45 +0200 Message-ID: <4875D8A5.2040201@bull.net> References: <20080703144013.737951000@bull.net> <20080704102702.GB4531@elf.ucw.cz> <20080707190119.GB25934@us.ibm.com> <20080708105228.GB15311@elf.ucw.cz> <20080708215034.GB2179@us.ibm.com> <20080708215821.GE17083@elf.ucw.cz> <20080709022035.GA21249@us.ibm.com> <4875C138.5060506@bull.net> <6599ad830807100134l362ab98bt868e078eeb17b838@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <6599ad830807100134l362ab98bt868e078eeb17b838-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Paul Menage Cc: containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, Pavel Machek List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Paul Menage wrote: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:58 AM, Nadia Derbey wrote: > >>Actually, what I've started working on these days is replace the proc >>interface by a syscall to set the next_syscall_data field: I think this >>might help us avoid defining a precise list of the new syscalls we need? > > > Isn't that just sys_indirect(), but split into two syscall invocations > rather than one? > Yes, from what I've read about the sys_indirect(), it is. Unfortunalty, I hadn't followed the thread, so except because of its "ugliness" (again ;-) ) I don't exactly know why the idea has been given up. Regards, Nadia