Linux Container Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano-NmTC/0ZBporQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Linux Containers <containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Checkpoint/Restart mini-summit
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 18:15:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <487F702B.4070706@fr.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1prpfc7hj.fsf-B27657KtZYmhTnVgQlOflh2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org>

Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano-NmTC/0ZBporQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> writes:
> 
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Here is a proposition a more detailed agenda for the checkpoint/restart 
>> mini-summit. If everybody is ok with it, I will update the wiki.
>>
>> Comments are welcome :)
> 
> A reading list is useful, even to help get some ideas circulating
> before we get there.
> 
> Ultimately the technical details will need to be resolve by
> people discussing things and sending patches back and forth
> on the mailing lists.
> 
> I don't think a detailed agenda is going to get us anywhere.
> Especially not one focused on the implementation details.
> 
> I think we need to start by seeing what we can agree on.  Certainly we
> agree that checkpoint/restart needs to be part of the picture.  What
> are the problems that the linux community can solve with
> checkpoint/restart.
> 
> Then we need to talk about what kind of implementation we want to
> merge into mainline.  How do we sell it, and how do we implement
> it without affecting long term maintainability.
> 
> I think the granularity of our operations, and what state we
> save is important.  I don't think how we save it is important
> unless it affects one of our requirements.
> 
> As for the posix draft and the historical Cray & SGI implementations.
> They were on the wrong track.  The did not have namespace support
> so they could not in general restore their checkpoints.
> 
> There are also a lot of things you have failed to touch on, that
> I'm not going to go into now.
> 
> With any luck the mini-summit before OLS will be the start of a
> conversation that will go on all week, and continue on the mailing
> lists.
> 
> The real question is how do we coordinate our efforts to build a good
> linux checkpoint/restart implementation.
> 
>> * Documentation
>>    * Zap : www.ncl.cs.columbia.edu/publications/usenix2007_fordist.pdf
>>    * Metacluster : lxc.sourceforge.net/doc/ols2006/lxc-ols2006.pdf
>>    * OpenVZ : http://wiki.openvz.org/Checkpointing_and_live_migration
>>    * Checkpoint/Restart technology : 
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Application_checkpointing
>>    * Virtual Servers and Checkpoint/Restart in Mainstream Linux : Sigops 
>> document
> 
> There is also the classic emacs undump.
> The very simple vmadump from bproc.

Thanks Eric for all your comments. I agree the agenda is a little big, I 
will reduce it and I will add the points you raised. I have other points 
from by Oren I will add too, perhaps that will cover more aspect of the 
discussion.

   -- Daniel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-07-17 16:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-15 10:49 Checkpoint/Restart mini-summit Daniel Lezcano
     [not found] ` <487C80C9.2040105-NmTC/0ZBporQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-07-15 18:44   ` Eric W. Biederman
     [not found]     ` <m1prpfc7hj.fsf-B27657KtZYmhTnVgQlOflh2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org>
2008-07-16 15:15       ` Serge E. Hallyn
     [not found]         ` <20080716151530.GA26496-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-07-16 19:04           ` Eric W. Biederman
     [not found]             ` <m18ww14pm7.fsf-B27657KtZYmhTnVgQlOflh2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org>
2008-07-16 19:35               ` Serge E. Hallyn
     [not found]                 ` <20080716193538.GA28393-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-07-16 21:27                   ` Eric W. Biederman
     [not found]                     ` <m1sku9zfhc.fsf-B27657KtZYmhTnVgQlOflh2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org>
2008-07-17  2:27                       ` Serge E. Hallyn
     [not found]                         ` <20080717022729.GC21726-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-07-17  3:02                           ` C. Craig Ross
2008-07-17 16:15       ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2008-07-15 18:54   ` Eric W. Biederman
     [not found]     ` <m1lk03c71k.fsf-B27657KtZYmhTnVgQlOflh2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org>
2008-07-16 15:17       ` Serge E. Hallyn
     [not found]         ` <20080716151707.GB26496-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-07-16 15:26           ` Daniel Lezcano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=487F702B.4070706@fr.ibm.com \
    --to=dlezcano-nmtc/0zbporqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox