From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Linux Containers <containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: nsgroup autoremoving
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:35:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4973A0AD.6090508@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090116165217.GA8477-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezcano-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org):
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> While trying to unshare a namespace with the clone syscall with an
>> inifinite loop, I got an EEXIST.
>> That looks weird to have such syscall returning EEXIST ... :)
>>
>> After investigating, it appears the ns_cgroup creates automatically a
>> control group named with the pid number when we call the clone syscall
>> with a namespace parameter and when the namespace exits, the control
>> group is not automatically removed. So when the pid numbers are recycled
>> we conflict with a previous ns_cgroup name and the clone fails.
>>
>> IMHO, if the nsgroup is automatically created, it should automatically
>> destroyed, otherwise what will happen to application using the
>> namespaces (eg. mount namespace) wrote before nsgroup appeared ?
>>
>
> but you can have it automatically destroyed. I.e. I did the
> following:
>
> mount -t cgroup -o freezer,ns freezer /cgroup
> cat > /bin/release_cgroup.sh << EOF
> #!/bin/sh
> echo "Removing dead cgroup .$*." >> /var/log/cgroup
> rmdir /cgroup/$* >> /var/log/cgroup 2>&1
> echo "return value was $?" >> /var/log/cgroup
> EOF
> echo /bin/release_cgroup.sh > /cgroup/release_agent
> echo 1 > /cgroup/notify_on_release
> chmod ugo+x /bin/release_cgroup.sh
> ns_exec -m /bin/sh
> ls /cgroup`
> 3581 notify_on_release release_agent tasks
> exit
> ls /cgroup
> notify_on_release release_agent tasks
>
Assuming you mount with all the subsystems, this script will destroy the
non-nsgroup too. Each time I create a control group manually, I have to
unset the notify_on_release, right ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-18 21:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-16 10:23 nsgroup autoremoving Daniel Lezcano
[not found] ` <49706006.80002-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-16 16:52 ` Serge E. Hallyn
[not found] ` <20090116165217.GA8477-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-18 21:35 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
[not found] ` <4973A0AD.6090508-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-18 23:32 ` Serge E. Hallyn
[not found] ` <20090118233216.GA10126-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-19 3:05 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4973A0AD.6090508@free.fr \
--to=daniel.lezcano-ganu6spqydw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox