From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
To: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar-YTcQvvOqK21BDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Linux Containers <containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: storage considerations
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:38:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49887307.1080105@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7B7881568CF40E4388B615CD06F87B980989E9-cHQ43lMKbBKenyD9vqZGNUEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
Dietmar Maurer wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I think we should have several options for the root storage:
>
> 1.) simply use the host filesystem (like Openvz)
>
> - special quota support is needed (simfs?)
>
> - quota support depends on ext3 fs, so this only works for
> local attached storage (does not work on NFS)
>
> - LVM snapshots are slow, because the snapshot includes all
> container
> on that filesystem.
>
> - it is easy to expand/shrink storage
>
> - best storage consolidation (storage overcommit possible)
>
> 2.) loop mounting an image (dm-loop)
>
> - quota works
>
> - works on any filesystem (even NFS)
>
> - don't know how to make snapshots?
>
Perhaps we can use the future union mount or unionfs in order to make
incremental snapshot ?
> - difficult to resize (but manageable)
>
> - slow
>
> 3.) use a block device
>
> - works great with LVM2 volumes
>
> - quota works
>
> - best performance
>
> - works with shared block devices (incredible fast migrations)
>
> - snapshots works (at least when using an LVM2 volume)
>
> - it is difficult to resize block devices (but manageable)
>
> The question is: when do we mount the root block device?
>
> OpenVZ has one additional state, called 'mounted'. For example you can
> do:
>
> # vzctl mount VMID
> # vzctl umount VMID
>
> Or we simply mount the root when we create the container?
>
> What do you think?
>
It is very interesting. Thanks for giving an overview of the available
storage solutions.
You have a lot of idea and I need some time to compile them :)
At present lxc provides a rootfs which is symlink to the directory to
chroot. It could be nice is to replace this by a directory and bind
mount something on top of it. By "something" I mean one of the solutions
you are proposing or something else.
I would prefer to find a generic solution, that is, a configuration
format which can be interpreted in a generic way by lxc.
The fstab file format is a good candidate :)
We can:
1 - replace the fstab file by a new keyword lxc.mount = "a fstab line"
2 - each time this keyword is found add a mntentry in a mount list of
the configuration
3 - automatically add the bind mount of the rootfs in this list when
the lxc.rootfs is found
From the point of view of the configuration / setup:
the lxc-create creates the fstab file (do not mount anything otherwise
that will be lost at reboot).
the lxc-start/lxc-execute mount everything (it is up to the user to
define the right order in the configuration file).
For example:
lxc.mount = myhost:/linux /linux nfs defaults 0 0
lxc.rootfs = /root/debian4
That will create the fstab file in the container configuration tree:
myhost:/mydistro /root/mydistro nfs defaults 0 0
/root/mydistro /var/lxc/debian4/rootfs bind 0 0
This fstab can be used with a script for example to unshare the mount
namespace, bind mount the fstab on top of /etc/fstab and call mount -a :)
In any case, the configuration file stays generic and a new fs support
can be added without changing the lxc version.
Shall this fit your needs ?
next parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-03 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <7B7881568CF40E4388B615CD06F87B980989E9@clara.maurer-it.com>
[not found] ` <7B7881568CF40E4388B615CD06F87B980989E9-cHQ43lMKbBKenyD9vqZGNUEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-03 16:38 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
[not found] ` <49887307.1080105-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-03 17:14 ` storage considerations Dietmar Maurer
2009-02-04 16:05 ` Serge E. Hallyn
[not found] ` <20090204160518.GC2039-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-04 16:52 ` Daniel Lezcano
[not found] ` <4989C7C0.6060906-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-04 17:09 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-02-04 23:04 ` Oren Laadan
[not found] ` <498A1EE6.3000204-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-05 7:01 ` Dietmar Maurer
[not found] ` <7B7881568CF40E4388B615CD06F87B98098A12-cHQ43lMKbBKenyD9vqZGNUEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-05 10:56 ` [Devel] " Dietmar Maurer
2009-02-05 15:36 ` Serge E. Hallyn
[not found] ` <20090205153638.GD27410-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-05 15:45 ` Dietmar Maurer
[not found] ` <7B7881568CF40E4388B615CD06F87B98098A22-cHQ43lMKbBKenyD9vqZGNUEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-05 16:04 ` Serge E. Hallyn
[not found] ` <20090205160402.GE27410-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-05 16:18 ` Dietmar Maurer
2009-02-05 7:08 ` Dietmar Maurer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49887307.1080105@free.fr \
--to=daniel.lezcano-ganu6spqydw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dietmar-YTcQvvOqK21BDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox