From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oren Laadan Subject: c/r, time, and virtualization Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 01:11:24 -0400 Message-ID: <4A6A93FC.7090209@librato.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Linux Containers , "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Jeff Dike List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Hi, I wonder what's that status of time namespaces and virtual time(rs) ? http://lwn.net/Articles/180375/ - "virtual time" coverage in LWN (2006) http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/4/13/172 - patchset and thread on LKML http://lwn.net/Articles/249080/ - kernel summit 2007 - containers It will be handy for c/r of timers (posix-timers) that I'm working on. A couple of obstacles off the top of my head: - Lack of clone flags -- we can use clone_with_pids() for that. - Fast gettimeofday() via vdso -- perhaps a vdso page per time-ns (containing the necessary deltas). Is anyone working on it ? Oren.