From: Munehiro Ikeda <m-ikeda-MDRzhb/z0dd8UrSeD/g0lQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Dong-Jae Kang <baramsori72-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: ioband-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
corsetproject-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [Test Result] I/O bandwidth Control by dm-ioband - partition-based environment
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:40:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A9BFCFD.6080702@ds.jp.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2891419e0908310016k7aa8acc6o548c1ce5a31ba2ba-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
Hello Dong-Jae,
Dong-Jae Kang wrote, on 08/31/2009 03:16 AM:
> Hi Munehiro Ikeda
> Thanks for your attention.
> and sorry for late reply.
No problem.
> 2009/8/29 Munehiro Ikeda <m-ikeda-MDRzhb/z0dd8UrSeD/g0lQ@public.gmane.org
> <mailto:m-ikeda-MDRzhb/z0dd8UrSeD/g0lQ@public.gmane.org>>
>
> Hello Dong-Jae,
>
> Dong-Jae Kang wrote, on 08/26/2009 09:46 PM:
>
> Hi Ryo
>
> I attached new test result
> file(ioband-partition-based-evaluation.xls)in
> this mail.
> In this time, it is not virtualization environment.
> I evaluated partition-based use cases before I do it in
> vitualization
> environment.
> because I think the two cases are smilar each other.
>
> The detailed information about the evaluation can be referred in
> attached
> file.
>
> If you have any questions or comments after examine it,
> please give me your opinion.
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> Good work.
> Please let me ask silly questions.
>
> (1) About what "target" means
> I guess "device" means writing to device files directly
> (--filename=/dev/mapper/ioband1)
> and "directory" means mounting these device files and writing to
> some directory
> on the filesystem
> (--filename=/mnt/ioband1/test.dat, I'm assuming mount
> /dev/mapper/ioband1 on
> /mnt/ioband1),
> am I wright?
>
> Yes, you are right.
> I also think the terms can leave misunderstanding. :)
>
>
> (2) Conditions in RDF sheet
> Conditions in sheet "RDF" and "RBF" are same but results are
> slightly different.
> Should "Mode" in RDF sheet be "Direct"?
>
> As the Report sheet in the file shows,
> "D" in RDF means Direct I/O and "B" in RBF means Buffered I/O(delayed I/O).
> I think the reason for difference in result, especially several
> fluctuation in RBF, is
> related with buffer cache and pdflushd daemon.
> So, generally, I/O bandwidth controll in direct I/O mode is
> more accurate than that of buffered I/O mode.
Alright, I see. Completely no fluctuation in direct write is interesting.
Thank you for the explanation.
Muuhh
--
IKEDA, Munehiro
NEC Corporation of America
m-ikeda-MDRzhb/z0dd8UrSeD/g0lQ@public.gmane.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-31 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-27 1:46 [Test Result] I/O bandwidth Control by dm-ioband - partition-based environment Dong-Jae Kang
[not found] ` <2891419e0908261846v4fa19791q4552975f10dd64e5-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-27 6:20 ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-08-28 15:58 ` Munehiro Ikeda
[not found] ` <4A97FEC1.1010500-MDRzhb/z0dd8UrSeD/g0lQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-31 7:16 ` Dong-Jae Kang
[not found] ` <2891419e0908310016k7aa8acc6o548c1ce5a31ba2ba-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-31 16:40 ` Munehiro Ikeda [this message]
[not found] ` <20090827.152042.104028330.ryov@valinux.co.jp>
[not found] ` <20090827.152042.104028330.ryov-jCdQPDEk3idL9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-27 11:03 ` Dong-Jae Kang
[not found] ` <2891419e0908270403kd439d29gedeea6fcae753d6d@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <2891419e0908270403kd439d29gedeea6fcae753d6d-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-28 10:24 ` Dong-Jae Kang
[not found] ` <2891419e0908280324v32e7ba3fq88eb754052cbf094@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <2891419e0908280324v32e7ba3fq88eb754052cbf094-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-31 2:12 ` Ryo Tsuruta
[not found] ` <20090831.111233.226777940.ryov@valinux.co.jp>
[not found] ` <20090831.111233.226777940.ryov-jCdQPDEk3idL9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-31 10:08 ` Dong-Jae Kang
[not found] ` <2891419e0908310308w31c46180nce72d271cd947c98@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <2891419e0908310308w31c46180nce72d271cd947c98-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-02 11:18 ` Ryo Tsuruta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A9BFCFD.6080702@ds.jp.nec.com \
--to=m-ikeda-mdrzhb/z0dd8ursed/g0lq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=baramsori72-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=corsetproject-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ioband-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox