Linux Container Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Munehiro Ikeda <m-ikeda-MDRzhb/z0dd8UrSeD/g0lQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Dong-Jae Kang <baramsori72-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: ioband-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
	containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
	corsetproject-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [Test Result] I/O bandwidth Control by dm-ioband - partition-based environment
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:40:29 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A9BFCFD.6080702@ds.jp.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2891419e0908310016k7aa8acc6o548c1ce5a31ba2ba-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>

Hello Dong-Jae,

Dong-Jae Kang wrote, on 08/31/2009 03:16 AM:
> Hi Munehiro Ikeda
> Thanks for your attention.
> and sorry for late reply.

No problem.


> 2009/8/29 Munehiro Ikeda <m-ikeda-MDRzhb/z0dd8UrSeD/g0lQ@public.gmane.org
> <mailto:m-ikeda-MDRzhb/z0dd8UrSeD/g0lQ@public.gmane.org>>
>
>     Hello Dong-Jae,
>
>     Dong-Jae Kang wrote, on 08/26/2009 09:46 PM:
>
>         Hi Ryo
>
>         I attached new test result
>         file(ioband-partition-based-evaluation.xls)in
>         this mail.
>         In this time, it is not virtualization environment.
>         I evaluated partition-based use cases before I do it in
>         vitualization
>         environment.
>         because I think the two cases are smilar each other.
>
>         The detailed information about the evaluation can be referred in
>         attached
>         file.
>
>         If you have any questions or comments after examine it,
>         please give me your opinion.
>
>         Thank you.
>
>
>     Good work.
>     Please let me ask silly questions.
>
>     (1) About what "target" means
>     I guess "device" means writing to device files directly
>     (--filename=/dev/mapper/ioband1)
>     and "directory" means mounting these device files and writing to
>     some directory
>     on the filesystem
>     (--filename=/mnt/ioband1/test.dat, I'm assuming mount
>     /dev/mapper/ioband1 on
>     /mnt/ioband1),
>     am I wright?
>
> Yes, you are right.
> I also think the terms can leave misunderstanding. :)
>
>
>     (2) Conditions  in RDF sheet
>     Conditions in sheet "RDF" and "RBF" are same but results are
>     slightly different.
>     Should "Mode" in RDF sheet be "Direct"?
>
> As the Report sheet in the file shows,
> "D" in RDF means Direct I/O and "B" in RBF means Buffered I/O(delayed I/O).
> I think the reason for difference in result, especially several
> fluctuation in RBF, is
> related with buffer cache  and pdflushd daemon.
> So, generally, I/O bandwidth controll in direct I/O mode is
> more accurate than that of buffered I/O mode.

Alright, I see.  Completely no fluctuation in direct write is interesting.
Thank you for the explanation.

Muuhh

-- 
IKEDA, Munehiro
   NEC Corporation of America
     m-ikeda-MDRzhb/z0dd8UrSeD/g0lQ@public.gmane.org

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-08-31 16:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-27  1:46 [Test Result] I/O bandwidth Control by dm-ioband - partition-based environment Dong-Jae Kang
     [not found] ` <2891419e0908261846v4fa19791q4552975f10dd64e5-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-27  6:20   ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-08-28 15:58   ` Munehiro Ikeda
     [not found]     ` <4A97FEC1.1010500-MDRzhb/z0dd8UrSeD/g0lQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-31  7:16       ` Dong-Jae Kang
     [not found]         ` <2891419e0908310016k7aa8acc6o548c1ce5a31ba2ba-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-31 16:40           ` Munehiro Ikeda [this message]
     [not found] ` <20090827.152042.104028330.ryov@valinux.co.jp>
     [not found]   ` <20090827.152042.104028330.ryov-jCdQPDEk3idL9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-27 11:03     ` Dong-Jae Kang
     [not found]   ` <2891419e0908270403kd439d29gedeea6fcae753d6d@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]     ` <2891419e0908270403kd439d29gedeea6fcae753d6d-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-28 10:24       ` Dong-Jae Kang
     [not found]     ` <2891419e0908280324v32e7ba3fq88eb754052cbf094@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]       ` <2891419e0908280324v32e7ba3fq88eb754052cbf094-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-31  2:12         ` Ryo Tsuruta
     [not found]       ` <20090831.111233.226777940.ryov@valinux.co.jp>
     [not found]         ` <20090831.111233.226777940.ryov-jCdQPDEk3idL9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-31 10:08           ` Dong-Jae Kang
     [not found]         ` <2891419e0908310308w31c46180nce72d271cd947c98@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]           ` <2891419e0908310308w31c46180nce72d271cd947c98-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-02 11:18             ` Ryo Tsuruta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A9BFCFD.6080702@ds.jp.nec.com \
    --to=m-ikeda-mdrzhb/z0dd8ursed/g0lq@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=baramsori72-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=corsetproject-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=ioband-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox