From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Oren Laadan <orenl@cs.columbia.edu>,
Linux Containers <containers@lists.osdl.org>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
SELinux <selinux@tycho.nsa.gov>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] cr: debug security_checkpoint_header and security_may_restart
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 11:31:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AA55183.4020407@schaufler-ca.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090904134611.GA11508@us.ibm.com>
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Casey Schaufler (casey@schaufler-ca.com):
>
>> Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>>
>>> This patch, for debugging only, introduces a silly admin-controlled
>>> 'policy version' for smack. By default the version is 1. An
>>> admin (with CAP_MAC_ADMIN) can change it by echoing a new value
>>> into /smack/version.
>>>
>>>
>> The scheme you have suggested is just one step off of completely
>> acceptable for real. More detail below, but if you make the "version"
>> a string instead of a number I'm happy with it. In particular, a
>> string that would itself be a valid Smack label makes everything
>> really simple.
>>
>
> Presumably at many sites the version will be a unique string not
> used as a label anywhere else. That's ok?
>
>
>> It would take me a few days, but if you're not in a real hurry or
>> you're lazier than I am (yeah, right) I could provide a patch that
>> does it. Or, if I haven't been completely incomprehensible, you
>> could do a revision.
>>
>
> Heh, I'm in no hurry. I'll mark this to do midway next week, if
> you haven't gotten around to it first. Thanks!
>
I hate to be a bother, but what tree are you basing these patches on?
Suspect that I missed a round of patches along the way, and can't apply
the ones I do have.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-07 18:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-03 22:28 [RFC PATCH 1/2] cr: lsm: provide hooks for an LSM to track policy changes Serge E. Hallyn
2009-09-03 22:28 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] cr: debug security_checkpoint_header and security_may_restart Serge E. Hallyn
2009-09-04 5:20 ` Casey Schaufler
2009-09-04 13:46 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-09-07 18:31 ` Casey Schaufler [this message]
2009-09-08 4:12 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-09-09 4:43 ` Casey Schaufler
2009-09-09 14:35 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-09-09 14:52 ` Casey Schaufler
2009-09-09 19:46 ` Serge E. Hallyn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AA55183.4020407@schaufler-ca.com \
--to=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=orenl@cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox