From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Oren Laadan <orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] c/r: fix broken compilation for architectures that don't
	support c/r
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:59:41 -0500
Message-ID: <4B73102D.1020104@cs.columbia.edu>
References: <1265759643-23495-1-git-send-email-orenl@cs.columbia.edu>
	<20100210180256.GD12251@us.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100210180256.GD12251-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers>,
	<mailto:containers-request-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/containers>
List-Post: <mailto:containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <mailto:containers-request-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers>,
	<mailto:containers-request-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org



Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Oren Laadan (orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org):
>> The include file <linux/checkpoint_hdr.h> itself includes the header
>> <asm/checkpoint_hdr.h>, which exists only for supported architectures.
>>
>> Therefore, non c/r specific code must not include it unconditionally,
>> but only when CONFIG_CHECKPOINT is defined.
>>
>> Instead, either use include <linux/checkpoint.h>, which take the
>> necessary precautions (preferred), or explicit test CONFIG_CHECKPOINT.
>>
>> This patch fixes this in eventfd.c and eventpoll.c, to allow a kernel
>> with the c/r patches to compile on other architectures.
>>
>> (Reported by: Christoffer Dall)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Oren Laadan <orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
>> ---
>>  fs/eventfd.c   |    1 -
>>  fs/eventpoll.c |    5 -----
>>  2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/eventfd.c b/fs/eventfd.c
>> index 5259d6e..3277534 100644
>> --- a/fs/eventfd.c
>> +++ b/fs/eventfd.c
>> @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
>>  #include <linux/kref.h>
>>  #include <linux/eventfd.h>
>>  #include <linux/checkpoint.h>
>> -#include <linux/checkpoint_hdr.h>
>>
>>  struct eventfd_ctx {
>>  	struct kref kref;
>> diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
>> index cb286c7..aedaf87 100644
>> --- a/fs/eventpoll.c
>> +++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
>> @@ -38,12 +38,7 @@
>>  #include <asm/io.h>
>>  #include <asm/mman.h>
>>  #include <asm/atomic.h>
>> -
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_CHECKPOINT
>>  #include <linux/checkpoint.h>
>> -#include <linux/checkpoint_hdr.h>
>> -#include <linux/deferqueue.h>
> 
> Where does deferqueue.h get included from, though?

Oops... will add.

Otherwise ok ?

> 
> Kind of looks like checkpoint_types.h should include that anyway,
> then we can remove the explicit include from
> checkpoint{checkpoint,files,restart,sys}.c

It isn't necessary in checkpoint.h because there is only
a pointer reference to this deferqueue structure.

Oren.