From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oren Laadan Subject: Re: Containers vs. OpenVZ Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 20:59:46 -0400 Message-ID: <4C6B3082.2070802@cs.columbia.edu> References: <20100817103339.GA8495@nibiru.local> <20100818002416.GG3648@count0.beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100818002416.GG3648-52DBMbEzqgQ/wnmkkaCWp/UQ3DHhIser@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Matt Helsley Cc: containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org, Enrico Weigelt List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org On 08/17/2010 08:24 PM, Matt Helsley wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:33:40PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote: >> >> Hi folks, >> >> >> could anyone please point out the difference main difference >> between linux-containers and openvz ? It is possible to replace >> ovz by linux-containers yet ? >> >> thx > > Hi, > > At the very least there is no kernel code in mainline for > checkpoint/restart of containers at this time. We're still working on > patches for that feature. So that's one major difference between > "linux-containers" and openvz. To be fair, there is not kernel code in mainline for openvz either... Oren. > > I'm sure there are other differences which openvz and lxc folks > can point out but this is the one I'm presently most-keenly aware of. I > haven't had time to follow what's new with openvz so I'll leave the > rest of the comparison to other folks. > > Cheers, > -Matt Helsley > _______________________________________________ > Containers mailing list > Containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org > https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers >