From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oren Laadan Subject: Re: Containers vs. OpenVZ Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:00:31 -0400 Message-ID: <4C6C039F.6000304@cs.columbia.edu> References: <20100817103339.GA8495@nibiru.local> <20100818002416.GG3648@count0.beaverton.ibm.com> <4C6B3082.2070802@cs.columbia.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Marc Aymerich Cc: containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org, Enrico Weigelt List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org On 08/18/2010 06:48 AM, Marc Aymerich wrote: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Marc Aymerich wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 2:59 AM, Oren Laadanwrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 08/17/2010 08:24 PM, Matt Helsley wrote: >>>> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:33:40PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi folks, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> could anyone please point out the difference main difference >>>>> between linux-containers and openvz ? It is possible to replace >>>>> ovz by linux-containers yet ? >>>>> >>>>> thx >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> At the very least there is no kernel code in mainline for >>>> checkpoint/restart of containers at this time. We're still working on >>>> patches for that feature. So that's one major difference between >>>> "linux-containers" and openvz. >>> >>> To be fair, there is not kernel code in mainline for openvz either... >> >> >> >> really? http://wiki.openvz.org/File:Kernel_patches_stats.png >> > > sorry Oren I misunderstand your mail. It's true, there is no c/r on mainline > for openvz too. No problem, my language was not entirely unambiguous. To be precise, while openvz is a great project and contribute{s,d} a lot to the kernel, the openvz kernel - with or without c/r - is not in mainline. Oren.