From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Li Zefan Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] cgroups: Task counter subsystem v6 Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 10:57:33 +0800 Message-ID: <4EB3549D.5090404@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <1317668832-10784-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <20111004150111.e9337268.akpm00@gmail.com> <20111028163021.1ce61f8a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20111103170038.GG8198@somewhere.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20111103170038.GG8198-oHC15RC7JGTpAmv0O++HtFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Aditya Kali , Tim Hockin , Paul Menage , Kay Sievers , LKML , Oleg Nesterov , Johannes Weiner , Tejun Heo , Andrew Morton , Containers List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org >>> There may be other ways to cobble this sort of safety together, but >>> they are less appealing for various reasons. cgroups are how we >>> control groups of related pids. >>> >>> I'd really love to be able to use this. >> >> Has it been confirmed that this implementation actually solves the >> problem? ie: tested a bit? >> >> btw, Frederic told me that this version of the patchset had some >> serious problem so it's on hold pending an upgrade, regardless of other >> matters. > > Yep. The particular issue is https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/10/13/532 > > Li Zefan proposed a fix (https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/10/17/26) which I'm > currently reworking. > We really need to coordinate cgroup patches. I mean, the patchset+fix conflict with Tejun's work, and the conflict is not trivial. > But then I'd love it if you can test this subsystem to see if it really matches > your needs, Tim. >