From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rui Xiang Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] syslog_ns: implement function for creating syslog ns Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:39:01 +0800 Message-ID: <51F73555.1020204@huawei.com> References: <1375065080-26740-1-git-send-email-rui.xiang@huawei.com> <1375065080-26740-8-git-send-email-rui.xiang@huawei.com> <51F64313.4010700@cn.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <51F64313.4010700-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Gu Zheng Cc: containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, serge.hallyn-GeWIH/nMZzLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, libo.chen-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org, ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org On 2013/7/29 18:25, Gu Zheng wrote: > Hi Rui, > > On 07/29/2013 10:31 AM, Rui Xiang wrote: > >> Add create_syslog_ns function to create a new ns. We >> must create a user_ns before create a new syslog ns. >> And then tie the new syslog_ns to current user_ns >> instead of original syslog_ns which comes from >> parent user_ns. ... >> diff --git a/kernel/printk.c b/kernel/printk.c >> index fd2d600..6b561db 100644 >> --- a/kernel/printk.c >> +++ b/kernel/printk.c >> @@ -384,6 +384,10 @@ static int check_syslog_permissions(int type, bool from_file, >> || type == SYSLOG_ACTION_CONSOLE_LEVEL) >> ns = &init_syslog_ns; >> >> + /* create a new syslog ns */ >> + if (type == SYSLOG_ACTION_NEW_NS) >> + return 0; >> + > > Don't we need further permission or caps check here? Return success directly seems sloppy. > CAP_SYSLOG is checked in create_syslog_ns, so I think we can return 0 temporarily.