public inbox for containers@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Casey Schaufler <casey-iSGtlc1asvQWG2LlvL+J4A@public.gmane.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman"
	<ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
	Linux Containers
	<containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Paul Moore <paul-r2n+y4ga6xFZroRs9YW3xA@public.gmane.org>,
	jannh-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	khlebnikov-XoJtRXgx1JseBXzfvpsJ4g@public.gmane.org,
	linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	serge.hallyn-GeWIH/nMZzLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	oleg-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	esyr-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-security-module-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	luto-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	prakash.sangappa-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	Casey Schaufler <casey-iSGtlc1asvQWG2LlvL+J4A@public.gmane.org>,
	akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org,
	Nagarathnam Muthusamy
	<nagarathnam.muthusamy-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [REVIEW][PATCH 13/11] ipc/smack: Tidy up from the change in type of the ipc security hooks
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 17:05:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <80cd2fea-c9a8-4f26-acbb-e0ecb34e4e40@schaufler-ca.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y3iikp1y.fsf_-_-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>

On 3/23/2018 10:42 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Rename the variables shp, sma, msq to isp. As that is how the code already
> refers to those variables.

Thanks. It's important to keep the code readable.

> Collapse smack_of_shm, smack_of_sem, and smack_of_msq into smack_of_ipc,
> as the three functions had become completely identical.

Thanks. Completely reasonable and correct.

> Collapse smack_shm_alloc_security, smack_sem_alloc_security and
> smack_msg_queue_alloc_security into smack_ipc_alloc_security as the
> three functions had become identical.
>
> Collapse smack_shm_free_security, smack_sem_free_security and
> smack_msg_queue_free_security into smack_ipc_free_security as the three
> functions had become identical.

This is reasonable but unprecedented. Nowhere else is the
same function used to supply multiple LSM hooks. Does anyone
out there see a reason not to do this?

> Requested-by: Casey Schaufler <casey-iSGtlc1asvQWG2LlvL+J4A@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>  security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 197 +++++++++++++--------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 139 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> index d960c2ea8d79..0735b8db158b 100644
> --- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> +++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> @@ -2945,25 +2945,24 @@ static void smack_msg_msg_free_security(struct msg_msg *msg)
>  }
>  
>  /**
> - * smack_of_shm - the smack pointer for the shm
> - * @shp: the object
> + * smack_of_ipc - the smack pointer for the ipc
> + * @isp: the object
>   *
>   * Returns a pointer to the smack value
>   */
> -static struct smack_known *smack_of_shm(struct kern_ipc_perm *shp)
> +static struct smack_known *smack_of_ipc(struct kern_ipc_perm *isp)
>  {
> -	return (struct smack_known *)shp->security;
> +	return (struct smack_known *)isp->security;
>  }
>  
>  /**
> - * smack_shm_alloc_security - Set the security blob for shm
> - * @shp: the object
> + * smack_ipc_alloc_security - Set the security blob for ipc
> + * @isp: the object
>   *
>   * Returns 0
>   */
> -static int smack_shm_alloc_security(struct kern_ipc_perm *shp)
> +static int smack_ipc_alloc_security(struct kern_ipc_perm *isp)
>  {
> -	struct kern_ipc_perm *isp = shp;
>  	struct smack_known *skp = smk_of_current();
>  
>  	isp->security = skp;
> @@ -2971,34 +2970,32 @@ static int smack_shm_alloc_security(struct kern_ipc_perm *shp)
>  }
>  
>  /**
> - * smack_shm_free_security - Clear the security blob for shm
> - * @shp: the object
> + * smack_ipc_free_security - Clear the security blob for ipc
> + * @isp: the object
>   *
>   * Clears the blob pointer
>   */
> -static void smack_shm_free_security(struct kern_ipc_perm *shp)
> +static void smack_ipc_free_security(struct kern_ipc_perm *isp)
>  {
> -	struct kern_ipc_perm *isp = shp;
> -
>  	isp->security = NULL;
>  }
>  
>  /**
>   * smk_curacc_shm : check if current has access on shm
> - * @shp : the object
> + * @isp : the object
>   * @access : access requested
>   *
>   * Returns 0 if current has the requested access, error code otherwise
>   */
> -static int smk_curacc_shm(struct kern_ipc_perm *shp, int access)
> +static int smk_curacc_shm(struct kern_ipc_perm *isp, int access)
>  {
> -	struct smack_known *ssp = smack_of_shm(shp);
> +	struct smack_known *ssp = smack_of_ipc(isp);
>  	struct smk_audit_info ad;
>  	int rc;
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_AUDIT
>  	smk_ad_init(&ad, __func__, LSM_AUDIT_DATA_IPC);
> -	ad.a.u.ipc_id = shp->id;
> +	ad.a.u.ipc_id = isp->id;
>  #endif
>  	rc = smk_curacc(ssp, access, &ad);
>  	rc = smk_bu_current("shm", ssp, access, rc);
> @@ -3007,27 +3004,27 @@ static int smk_curacc_shm(struct kern_ipc_perm *shp, int access)
>  
>  /**
>   * smack_shm_associate - Smack access check for shm
> - * @shp: the object
> + * @isp: the object
>   * @shmflg: access requested
>   *
>   * Returns 0 if current has the requested access, error code otherwise
>   */
> -static int smack_shm_associate(struct kern_ipc_perm *shp, int shmflg)
> +static int smack_shm_associate(struct kern_ipc_perm *isp, int shmflg)
>  {
>  	int may;
>  
>  	may = smack_flags_to_may(shmflg);
> -	return smk_curacc_shm(shp, may);
> +	return smk_curacc_shm(isp, may);
>  }
>  
>  /**
>   * smack_shm_shmctl - Smack access check for shm
> - * @shp: the object
> + * @isp: the object
>   * @cmd: what it wants to do
>   *
>   * Returns 0 if current has the requested access, error code otherwise
>   */
> -static int smack_shm_shmctl(struct kern_ipc_perm *shp, int cmd)
> +static int smack_shm_shmctl(struct kern_ipc_perm *isp, int cmd)
>  {
>  	int may;
>  
> @@ -3051,81 +3048,42 @@ static int smack_shm_shmctl(struct kern_ipc_perm *shp, int cmd)
>  	default:
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
> -	return smk_curacc_shm(shp, may);
> +	return smk_curacc_shm(isp, may);
>  }
>  
>  /**
>   * smack_shm_shmat - Smack access for shmat
> - * @shp: the object
> + * @isp: the object
>   * @shmaddr: unused
>   * @shmflg: access requested
>   *
>   * Returns 0 if current has the requested access, error code otherwise
>   */
> -static int smack_shm_shmat(struct kern_ipc_perm *shp, char __user *shmaddr,
> +static int smack_shm_shmat(struct kern_ipc_perm *ipc, char __user *shmaddr,
>  			   int shmflg)
>  {
>  	int may;
>  
>  	may = smack_flags_to_may(shmflg);
> -	return smk_curacc_shm(shp, may);
> -}
> -
> -/**
> - * smack_of_sem - the smack pointer for the sem
> - * @sma: the object
> - *
> - * Returns a pointer to the smack value
> - */
> -static struct smack_known *smack_of_sem(struct kern_ipc_perm *sma)
> -{
> -	return (struct smack_known *)sma->security;
> -}
> -
> -/**
> - * smack_sem_alloc_security - Set the security blob for sem
> - * @sma: the object
> - *
> - * Returns 0
> - */
> -static int smack_sem_alloc_security(struct kern_ipc_perm *sma)
> -{
> -	struct kern_ipc_perm *isp = sma;
> -	struct smack_known *skp = smk_of_current();
> -
> -	isp->security = skp;
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
> -/**
> - * smack_sem_free_security - Clear the security blob for sem
> - * @sma: the object
> - *
> - * Clears the blob pointer
> - */
> -static void smack_sem_free_security(struct kern_ipc_perm *sma)
> -{
> -	struct kern_ipc_perm *isp = sma;
> -
> -	isp->security = NULL;
> +	return smk_curacc_shm(ipc, may);
>  }
>  
>  /**
>   * smk_curacc_sem : check if current has access on sem
> - * @sma : the object
> + * @isp : the object
>   * @access : access requested
>   *
>   * Returns 0 if current has the requested access, error code otherwise
>   */
> -static int smk_curacc_sem(struct kern_ipc_perm *sma, int access)
> +static int smk_curacc_sem(struct kern_ipc_perm *isp, int access)
>  {
> -	struct smack_known *ssp = smack_of_sem(sma);
> +	struct smack_known *ssp = smack_of_ipc(isp);
>  	struct smk_audit_info ad;
>  	int rc;
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_AUDIT
>  	smk_ad_init(&ad, __func__, LSM_AUDIT_DATA_IPC);
> -	ad.a.u.ipc_id = sma->id;
> +	ad.a.u.ipc_id = isp->id;
>  #endif
>  	rc = smk_curacc(ssp, access, &ad);
>  	rc = smk_bu_current("sem", ssp, access, rc);
> @@ -3134,27 +3092,27 @@ static int smk_curacc_sem(struct kern_ipc_perm *sma, int access)
>  
>  /**
>   * smack_sem_associate - Smack access check for sem
> - * @sma: the object
> + * @isp: the object
>   * @semflg: access requested
>   *
>   * Returns 0 if current has the requested access, error code otherwise
>   */
> -static int smack_sem_associate(struct kern_ipc_perm *sma, int semflg)
> +static int smack_sem_associate(struct kern_ipc_perm *isp, int semflg)
>  {
>  	int may;
>  
>  	may = smack_flags_to_may(semflg);
> -	return smk_curacc_sem(sma, may);
> +	return smk_curacc_sem(isp, may);
>  }
>  
>  /**
>   * smack_sem_shmctl - Smack access check for sem
> - * @sma: the object
> + * @isp: the object
>   * @cmd: what it wants to do
>   *
>   * Returns 0 if current has the requested access, error code otherwise
>   */
> -static int smack_sem_semctl(struct kern_ipc_perm *sma, int cmd)
> +static int smack_sem_semctl(struct kern_ipc_perm *isp, int cmd)
>  {
>  	int may;
>  
> @@ -3184,12 +3142,12 @@ static int smack_sem_semctl(struct kern_ipc_perm *sma, int cmd)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	return smk_curacc_sem(sma, may);
> +	return smk_curacc_sem(isp, may);
>  }
>  
>  /**
>   * smack_sem_semop - Smack checks of semaphore operations
> - * @sma: the object
> + * @isp: the object
>   * @sops: unused
>   * @nsops: unused
>   * @alter: unused
> @@ -3198,67 +3156,28 @@ static int smack_sem_semctl(struct kern_ipc_perm *sma, int cmd)
>   *
>   * Returns 0 if access is allowed, error code otherwise
>   */
> -static int smack_sem_semop(struct kern_ipc_perm *sma, struct sembuf *sops,
> +static int smack_sem_semop(struct kern_ipc_perm *isp, struct sembuf *sops,
>  			   unsigned nsops, int alter)
>  {
> -	return smk_curacc_sem(sma, MAY_READWRITE);
> -}
> -
> -/**
> - * smack_msg_alloc_security - Set the security blob for msg
> - * @msq: the object
> - *
> - * Returns 0
> - */
> -static int smack_msg_queue_alloc_security(struct kern_ipc_perm *msq)
> -{
> -	struct kern_ipc_perm *kisp = msq;
> -	struct smack_known *skp = smk_of_current();
> -
> -	kisp->security = skp;
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
> -/**
> - * smack_msg_free_security - Clear the security blob for msg
> - * @msq: the object
> - *
> - * Clears the blob pointer
> - */
> -static void smack_msg_queue_free_security(struct kern_ipc_perm *msq)
> -{
> -	struct kern_ipc_perm *kisp = msq;
> -
> -	kisp->security = NULL;
> -}
> -
> -/**
> - * smack_of_msq - the smack pointer for the msq
> - * @msq: the object
> - *
> - * Returns a pointer to the smack label entry
> - */
> -static struct smack_known *smack_of_msq(struct kern_ipc_perm *msq)
> -{
> -	return (struct smack_known *)msq->security;
> +	return smk_curacc_sem(isp, MAY_READWRITE);
>  }
>  
>  /**
>   * smk_curacc_msq : helper to check if current has access on msq
> - * @msq : the msq
> + * @isp : the msq
>   * @access : access requested
>   *
>   * return 0 if current has access, error otherwise
>   */
> -static int smk_curacc_msq(struct kern_ipc_perm *msq, int access)
> +static int smk_curacc_msq(struct kern_ipc_perm *isp, int access)
>  {
> -	struct smack_known *msp = smack_of_msq(msq);
> +	struct smack_known *msp = smack_of_ipc(isp);
>  	struct smk_audit_info ad;
>  	int rc;
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_AUDIT
>  	smk_ad_init(&ad, __func__, LSM_AUDIT_DATA_IPC);
> -	ad.a.u.ipc_id = msq->id;
> +	ad.a.u.ipc_id = isp->id;
>  #endif
>  	rc = smk_curacc(msp, access, &ad);
>  	rc = smk_bu_current("msq", msp, access, rc);
> @@ -3267,27 +3186,27 @@ static int smk_curacc_msq(struct kern_ipc_perm *msq, int access)
>  
>  /**
>   * smack_msg_queue_associate - Smack access check for msg_queue
> - * @msq: the object
> + * @isp: the object
>   * @msqflg: access requested
>   *
>   * Returns 0 if current has the requested access, error code otherwise
>   */
> -static int smack_msg_queue_associate(struct kern_ipc_perm *msq, int msqflg)
> +static int smack_msg_queue_associate(struct kern_ipc_perm *isp, int msqflg)
>  {
>  	int may;
>  
>  	may = smack_flags_to_may(msqflg);
> -	return smk_curacc_msq(msq, may);
> +	return smk_curacc_msq(isp, may);
>  }
>  
>  /**
>   * smack_msg_queue_msgctl - Smack access check for msg_queue
> - * @msq: the object
> + * @isp: the object
>   * @cmd: what it wants to do
>   *
>   * Returns 0 if current has the requested access, error code otherwise
>   */
> -static int smack_msg_queue_msgctl(struct kern_ipc_perm *msq, int cmd)
> +static int smack_msg_queue_msgctl(struct kern_ipc_perm *isp, int cmd)
>  {
>  	int may;
>  
> @@ -3310,29 +3229,29 @@ static int smack_msg_queue_msgctl(struct kern_ipc_perm *msq, int cmd)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	return smk_curacc_msq(msq, may);
> +	return smk_curacc_msq(isp, may);
>  }
>  
>  /**
>   * smack_msg_queue_msgsnd - Smack access check for msg_queue
> - * @msq: the object
> + * @isp: the object
>   * @msg: unused
>   * @msqflg: access requested
>   *
>   * Returns 0 if current has the requested access, error code otherwise
>   */
> -static int smack_msg_queue_msgsnd(struct kern_ipc_perm *msq, struct msg_msg *msg,
> +static int smack_msg_queue_msgsnd(struct kern_ipc_perm *isp, struct msg_msg *msg,
>  				  int msqflg)
>  {
>  	int may;
>  
>  	may = smack_flags_to_may(msqflg);
> -	return smk_curacc_msq(msq, may);
> +	return smk_curacc_msq(isp, may);
>  }
>  
>  /**
>   * smack_msg_queue_msgsnd - Smack access check for msg_queue
> - * @msq: the object
> + * @isp: the object
>   * @msg: unused
>   * @target: unused
>   * @type: unused
> @@ -3340,10 +3259,10 @@ static int smack_msg_queue_msgsnd(struct kern_ipc_perm *msq, struct msg_msg *msg
>   *
>   * Returns 0 if current has read and write access, error code otherwise
>   */
> -static int smack_msg_queue_msgrcv(struct kern_ipc_perm *msq, struct msg_msg *msg,
> +static int smack_msg_queue_msgrcv(struct kern_ipc_perm *isp, struct msg_msg *msg,
>  			struct task_struct *target, long type, int mode)
>  {
> -	return smk_curacc_msq(msq, MAY_READWRITE);
> +	return smk_curacc_msq(isp, MAY_READWRITE);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -4756,21 +4675,21 @@ static struct security_hook_list smack_hooks[] __lsm_ro_after_init = {
>  	LSM_HOOK_INIT(msg_msg_alloc_security, smack_msg_msg_alloc_security),
>  	LSM_HOOK_INIT(msg_msg_free_security, smack_msg_msg_free_security),
>  
> -	LSM_HOOK_INIT(msg_queue_alloc_security, smack_msg_queue_alloc_security),
> -	LSM_HOOK_INIT(msg_queue_free_security, smack_msg_queue_free_security),
> +	LSM_HOOK_INIT(msg_queue_alloc_security, smack_ipc_alloc_security),
> +	LSM_HOOK_INIT(msg_queue_free_security, smack_ipc_free_security),
>  	LSM_HOOK_INIT(msg_queue_associate, smack_msg_queue_associate),
>  	LSM_HOOK_INIT(msg_queue_msgctl, smack_msg_queue_msgctl),
>  	LSM_HOOK_INIT(msg_queue_msgsnd, smack_msg_queue_msgsnd),
>  	LSM_HOOK_INIT(msg_queue_msgrcv, smack_msg_queue_msgrcv),
>  
> -	LSM_HOOK_INIT(shm_alloc_security, smack_shm_alloc_security),
> -	LSM_HOOK_INIT(shm_free_security, smack_shm_free_security),
> +	LSM_HOOK_INIT(shm_alloc_security, smack_ipc_alloc_security),
> +	LSM_HOOK_INIT(shm_free_security, smack_ipc_free_security),
>  	LSM_HOOK_INIT(shm_associate, smack_shm_associate),
>  	LSM_HOOK_INIT(shm_shmctl, smack_shm_shmctl),
>  	LSM_HOOK_INIT(shm_shmat, smack_shm_shmat),
>  
> -	LSM_HOOK_INIT(sem_alloc_security, smack_sem_alloc_security),
> -	LSM_HOOK_INIT(sem_free_security, smack_sem_free_security),
> +	LSM_HOOK_INIT(sem_alloc_security, smack_ipc_alloc_security),
> +	LSM_HOOK_INIT(sem_free_security, smack_ipc_free_security),
>  	LSM_HOOK_INIT(sem_associate, smack_sem_associate),
>  	LSM_HOOK_INIT(sem_semctl, smack_sem_semctl),
>  	LSM_HOOK_INIT(sem_semop, smack_sem_semop),

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-03-25  0:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1520875093-18174-1-git-send-email-nagarathnam.muthusamy@oracle.com>
     [not found] ` <87vadzqqq6.fsf@xmission.com>
     [not found]   ` <990e88fa-ab50-9645-b031-14e1afbf7ccc@oracle.com>
     [not found]     ` <877eqejowd.fsf@xmission.com>
     [not found]       ` <3a46a03d-e4dd-59b6-e25f-0020be1b1dc9@oracle.com>
     [not found]         ` <87a7v2z2qa.fsf@xmission.com>
     [not found]           ` <87a7v2z2qa.fsf-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2018-03-23 19:11             ` [REVIEW][PATCH 00/11] ipc: Fixing the pid namespace support Eric W. Biederman
     [not found]               ` <87vadmobdw.fsf_-_-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2018-03-23 19:16                 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 01/11] sem/security: Pass kern_ipc_perm not sem_array into the sem security hooks Eric W. Biederman
     [not found]                   ` <20180323191614.32489-1-ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2018-03-23 21:46                     ` Casey Schaufler
     [not found]                   ` <bdf6ed62-b75c-1920-d5ce-ea08428d03d0@schaufler-ca.com>
     [not found]                     ` <bdf6ed62-b75c-1920-d5ce-ea08428d03d0-iSGtlc1asvQWG2LlvL+J4A@public.gmane.org>
2018-03-28 23:20                       ` Davidlohr Bueso
2018-03-23 19:16                 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 02/11] shm/security: Pass kern_ipc_perm not shmid_kernel into the shm " Eric W. Biederman
     [not found]                   ` <20180323191614.32489-2-ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2018-03-23 21:54                     ` Casey Schaufler
2018-03-23 19:16                 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 03/11] msg/security: Pass kern_ipc_perm not msg_queue into the msg_queue " Eric W. Biederman
2018-03-23 19:16                 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 04/11] sem: Move struct sem and struct sem_array into ipc/sem.c Eric W. Biederman
2018-03-23 19:16                 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 05/11] shm: Move struct shmid_kernel into ipc/shm.c Eric W. Biederman
2018-03-23 19:16                 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 06/11] msg: Move struct msg_queue into ipc/msg.c Eric W. Biederman
2018-03-23 19:16                 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 07/11] ipc: Move IPCMNI from include/ipc.h into ipc/util.h Eric W. Biederman
2018-03-23 19:16                 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 08/11] ipc/util: Helpers for making the sysvipc operations pid namespace aware Eric W. Biederman
2018-03-23 19:16                 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 09/11] ipc/shm: Fix shmctl(..., IPC_STAT, ...) between pid namespaces Eric W. Biederman
2018-03-23 19:16                 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 10/11] ipc/msg: Fix msgctl(..., " Eric W. Biederman
2018-03-23 19:16                 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 11/11] ipc/sem: Fix semctl(..., GETPID, " Eric W. Biederman
     [not found]                   ` <20180323191614.32489-11-ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2018-03-29  0:52                     ` Davidlohr Bueso
     [not found]                   ` <20180329005209.fnzr3hzvyr4oy3wi@linux-n805>
2018-03-30 19:09                     ` Davidlohr Bueso
     [not found]                     ` <20180330190951.nfcdwuzp42bl2lfy@linux-n805>
2018-03-30 20:12                       ` Eric W. Biederman
     [not found]                       ` <87y3i91fxh.fsf@xmission.com>
     [not found]                         ` <87y3i91fxh.fsf-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2018-03-30 20:45                           ` Davidlohr Bueso
2018-04-02 11:11                       ` Manfred Spraul
2018-03-24  5:40                 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 12/11] ipc: Directly call the security hook in ipc_ops.associate Eric W. Biederman
     [not found]                   ` <877eq2m3or.fsf_-_-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2018-03-28 23:40                     ` Davidlohr Bueso
2018-03-31  2:13                     ` James Morris
2018-03-24  5:42                 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 13/11] ipc/smack: Tidy up from the change in type of the ipc security hooks Eric W. Biederman
2018-03-29  1:12                 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 00/11] ipc: Fixing the pid namespace support Davidlohr Bueso
2018-03-29 18:42                   ` Eric W. Biederman
     [not found]               ` <20180323191614.32489-9-ebiederm@xmission.com>
     [not found]                 ` <20180323191614.32489-9-ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2018-03-23 21:17                   ` [REVIEW][PATCH 09/11] ipc/shm: Fix shmctl(..., IPC_STAT, ...) between pid namespaces NAGARATHNAM MUTHUSAMY
     [not found]                     ` <7df62190-2407-bfd4-d144-7304a8ea8ae3-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2018-03-23 21:33                       ` Eric W. Biederman
     [not found]                         ` <87lgeio4tb.fsf-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2018-03-23 21:41                           ` NAGARATHNAM MUTHUSAMY
     [not found]                             ` <1091a91e-f8ee-b091-6d95-78b33520fb2d-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2018-03-28 23:04                               ` Eric W. Biederman
     [not found]                             ` <87woxvajk9.fsf@xmission.com>
     [not found]                               ` <87woxvajk9.fsf-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2018-03-28 23:18                                 ` Nagarathnam Muthusamy
     [not found]               ` <20180323191614.32489-10-ebiederm@xmission.com>
     [not found]                 ` <20180323191614.32489-10-ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2018-03-23 21:21                   ` [REVIEW][PATCH 10/11] ipc/msg: Fix msgctl(..., " NAGARATHNAM MUTHUSAMY
     [not found]               ` <20180323191614.32489-3-ebiederm@xmission.com>
     [not found]                 ` <20180323191614.32489-3-ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2018-03-23 21:55                   ` [REVIEW][PATCH 03/11] msg/security: Pass kern_ipc_perm not msg_queue into the msg_queue security hooks Casey Schaufler
     [not found]                 ` <bb73b0ea-bcda-a996-8f14-48d9dd1b0940@schaufler-ca.com>
     [not found]                   ` <bb73b0ea-bcda-a996-8f14-48d9dd1b0940-iSGtlc1asvQWG2LlvL+J4A@public.gmane.org>
2018-03-24  5:37                     ` Eric W. Biederman
     [not found]               ` <87y3iikp1y.fsf_-_@xmission.com>
     [not found]                 ` <87y3iikp1y.fsf_-_-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2018-03-25  0:05                   ` Casey Schaufler [this message]
     [not found]                     ` <80cd2fea-c9a8-4f26-acbb-e0ecb34e4e40-iSGtlc1asvQWG2LlvL+J4A@public.gmane.org>
2018-03-28 23:38                       ` [REVIEW][PATCH 13/11] ipc/smack: Tidy up from the change in type of the ipc " Davidlohr Bueso
2018-03-28 23:57                   ` Davidlohr Bueso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=80cd2fea-c9a8-4f26-acbb-e0ecb34e4e40@schaufler-ca.com \
    --to=casey-isgtlc1asvqwg2llvl+j4a@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=esyr-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=jannh-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=khlebnikov-XoJtRXgx1JseBXzfvpsJ4g@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=luto-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=nagarathnam.muthusamy-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=oleg-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=paul-r2n+y4ga6xFZroRs9YW3xA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=prakash.sangappa-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=serge.hallyn-GeWIH/nMZzLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=xemul-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox