From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: [PATCH review 52/85] sunrpc: Properly encode kuids and kgids in auth.unix.gid rpc pipe upcalls. Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 13:29:35 -0800 Message-ID: <874nhfrjgg.fsf@xmission.com> References: <87621w14vs.fsf@xmission.com> <1360777934-5663-1-git-send-email-ebiederm@xmission.com> <1360777934-5663-52-git-send-email-ebiederm@xmission.com> <20130213210545.GO14195@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130213210545.GO14195-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org> (J. Bruce Fields's message of "Wed, 13 Feb 2013 16:05:45 -0500") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: "J. Bruce Fields" Cc: linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Linux Containers , Trond Myklebust , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org "J. Bruce Fields" writes: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 09:51:41AM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> From: "Eric W. Biederman" >> >> When a new rpc connection is established with an in-kernel server, the >> traffic passes through svc_process_common, and svc_set_client and down >> into svcauth_unix_set_client if it is of type RPC_AUTH_NULL or >> RPC_AUTH_UNIX. >> >> svcauth_unix_set_client then looks at the uid of the credential we >> have assigned to the incomming client and if we don't have the groups >> already cached makes an upcall to get a list of groups that the client >> can use. >> >> The upcall encodes send a rpc message to user space encoding the uid >> of the user whose groups we want to know. Encode the kuid of the user >> in the initial user namespace as nfs mounts can only happen today in >> the initial user namespace. > > OK, I didn't know that. > > (Though I'm unclear how it should matter to the server what user > namespace the client is in?) Perhaps I have the description a little scrambled. The short version is that to start I only support the initial network namespace. If I haven't succeeded it is my intent to initially limit the servers to the initial user namespace as well. I should see if I can figure that out. >> When a reply to an upcall comes in convert interpret the uid and gid values >> from the rpc pipe as uids and gids in the initial user namespace and convert >> them into kuids and kgids before processing them further. >> >> When reading proc files listing the uid to gid list cache convert the >> kuids and kgids from into uids and gids the initial user namespace. As we are >> displaying server internal details it makes sense to display these values >> from the servers perspective. > > All of these caches are already per-network-namespace. Ideally wouldn't > we also like to associate a user namespace with each cache somehow? Ideally yes. I read through the caches enough to figure out where there user space interfaces were, and to make certain we had conversions to/from kuids and kgids. I haven't looked at what user namespace makes sense for these caches. For this cache my first guess is that net->user_ns is what we want as it will be shared by all users in network namespace I presume. Eric