From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: For review: pid_namespaces(7) man page Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2013 20:03:55 -0800 Message-ID: <876217olp0.fsf@xmission.com> References: <1362110504.15531.4@driftwood> <1362369010.29250.3@driftwood> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1362369010.29250.3@driftwood> (Rob Landley's message of "Sun, 03 Mar 2013 21:50:10 -0600") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Rob Landley Cc: linux-man , Linux Containers , mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, lkml List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Rob Landley writes: > On 03/01/2013 03:57:40 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: >> > And yet the glibc guys insist on #define >> GNU_GNU_GNU_ALL_HAIL_STALLMAN in >> > order to access this Linux-specific feature which has nothing >> whatsoever to >> > do with the FSF. >> >> This is a misunderstanding. _GNU_SOURCE is the standard way to expose >> Linux-specific functionality from POSIX header files. > > What standard? The Linux kernel is not, and never was, part of the GNU > project. Is the argument that there should be a _LINUX_SOURCE directive in glibc for this? Although come to think of it I can't imagine how is a POSIX header. Last I looked it only had linux specific bits in it. Which makes needing any kind of #define strange. Eric