Re: [PATCH] devpts: Add ptmx_uid and ptmx_gid options

[ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org (Eric W. Biederman)]

Kenton Varda <kenton-AuYgBwuPrUQTaNkGU808tA@public.gmane.org> writes:

> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Alexander Larsson <alexl-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 12:14 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>>
>>> > Where does the second namespace enter into this?
>>>
>>> Step a.  Create create a user namespace where uid 0 is mapped to your
>>> real uid, and set up your sandbox (aka mount /dev/pts and everything
>>> else).
>>>
>>> Step b.  Create a nested user namespace where your uid is identity
>>> mapped and run your desktop application.  You can even drop all caps
>>> in
>>> your namespace.
>>
>> Just tried this. Its not the nicest, and it doubles the number of
>> namespaces in action for each sandbox, but it does work.
>
> How much overhead is involved in each user namespace?

sizeof(struct user_namespace).

> Is there any system-wide limit on total namespaces, other than RAM? 

There is a system-wide maximum depth, but not count.

>  Is there
> (non-negligible) CPU overhead for each syscall seeking permissions in
> the namespace?

ns_capable(ns, X) in some cases can walk up the from a starting user
namespace to the initial user.  (The only non-constant operation I am
aware of).  However unless the user namespace depth is deep it should
still take a negligible amount of time.

Eric