From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Szabolcs Szakacsits Subject: Re: [patch] util-linux-ng: unprivileged mounts support Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:42:33 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: util-linux-ng-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: util-linux-ng-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org, hch-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org, serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, viro-rfM+Q5joDG/XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org, kzak-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > But 'fusermount -u /tmp/test' does work, doesn't it? You're submitting patches to get rid of fusermount, aren't you? Most users absolutely have no idea what fusermount is and they would __really__ like to see umount(8) working finally. Szaka -- NTFS-3G: http://ntfs-3g.org