From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] pid: use namespaced iteration on processes while managing priority Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:46:46 -0800 Message-ID: References: <1229618553-6348-1-git-send-email-gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1229618553-6348-6-git-send-email-gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20081218170509.GC13188@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20081218170509.GC13188-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> (Serge E. Hallyn's message of "Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:05:09 -0600") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: "Serge E. Hallyn" Cc: Gowrishankar M , Containers , Dave , Sukadev , Balbir List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org "Serge E. Hallyn" writes: > Quoting Gowrishankar M (gowrishankar.m-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org): >> From: Gowrishankar M >> >> At present we scan all processes in init namespace, while getting or setting >> process priorities for a user. Incase of PID namespace, it leads to leak >> priority to processes in other namespace. >> >> Below patch proposes to use new macro controller to fix the boundary of >> processes list in current namespace. >> >> Signed-off-by: Gowrishankar M > > Acked-by: Serge Hallyn Serge please look again. This has absolutely nothing to do with pids. This is a problem to be solved with the user namespace. Eric