From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: C/R minisummit notes Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 07:20:30 -0700 Message-ID: References: <4887163F.5090801@fr.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4887163F.5090801-NmTC/0ZBporQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> (Daniel Lezcano's message of "Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:30:07 +0200") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Daniel Lezcano Cc: Linux Containers List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Daniel Lezcano writes: > * What are the problems that the linux community can solve with the > checkpoint/restart ? > > Eric Biederman reminds at the previous OLS nobody complained about the > checkpoint/restart Kernel summit. Not OLS. Which is a room packed full of maintainers. It isn't an endorsement but it also such a scary idea that people immediately rejected it either. Eric