From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: netns49 Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 09:32:16 -0600 Message-ID: References: <46FD1A3B.3060306@fr.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: <46FD1A3B.3060306-NmTC/0ZBporQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> (Daniel Lezcano's message of "Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:14:03 +0200") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Daniel Lezcano Cc: Linux Containers List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Daniel Lezcano writes: > Hi Eric, > > I noticed that you have a netns49 in your tree. Shall we use it ? I haven't pulled in your timewait socket work as it looked incomplete but I should have removed the unnecessary tests for &init_net that you noticed in your other patchset. Eric